Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
stable coins and CBDC standards is
0:02
fascinating because that is a fight
0:04
too. And then it's like stable
0:06
coins versus Bitcoin, right? But
0:08
the stable coins versus CBDCs things, stable coins
0:11
are acting in a way where they're like
0:13
bottoms up, becoming a country,
0:16
if that makes sense. Countries are trying
0:18
to reason with it. And the one
0:20
thing the US is starting to
0:22
understand is that whatever this thing is, it buys
0:24
a ton of treasuries. I think what is going
0:26
to end up happening is the western block, for
0:29
lack of a better word, they're
0:31
putting their eggs in stable coin basket. What
0:49
is up, guys? I
0:51
am Guy Swan, the guy who has read
0:53
more about Bitcoin than anybody
0:56
else you know. And we
0:58
have a really good conversation today.
1:00
Roger Huang, we read a piece
1:03
by him very recently. I
1:07
will have the link in the show notes. But he
1:09
wrote the book, Would Mao Hold Bitcoin?
1:11
And the piece we read
1:13
was about the China ban and
1:16
the state of Bitcoin, how Bitcoin
1:18
survived it. And because of his
1:20
exploration of this, he's really become
1:22
a resource for the
1:24
perspective and the situation
1:27
in China and his connections
1:29
with giving him a bit of a
1:31
boots on the ground perspective and a lot of what's
1:34
going on. But he actually
1:36
has a lot of other really
1:38
fascinating perspective on
1:40
Bitcoin as quote
1:42
unquote resistance money. Bitcoin, when
1:45
it fits into, he's done
1:47
a lot of traveling and exploration
1:50
with kind of where
1:52
does Bitcoin fit into these rebellions,
1:55
to the resistance, to the
1:57
state. And we talk a lot
1:59
about Hong Kong. because I never
2:01
really personally got a
2:04
lot of detail about what happened with Hong
2:06
Kong and how people think about that and
2:08
where does Bitcoin lie
2:12
in that
2:14
whole puzzle and what role did it
2:16
play versus what role did it not
2:19
play. Does the narrative that we tell
2:21
that seems to make sense about where
2:23
Bitcoin lies and what's important to focus
2:25
on in Bitcoin, does
2:28
that play out in the real world? Is
2:30
that the reality of it? Or
2:33
when we actually look at what's happening
2:35
on the ground, is
2:37
the story a little bit different and
2:39
even sometimes a little bit simpler? But I
2:41
think both his background and
2:43
the things that he's explored and has invested
2:46
real time into and the length of time
2:48
that he's looked into and
2:50
been able to watch and
2:53
put his perspective towards Bitcoin's
2:55
history and seeing it
2:57
happen live, I think
2:59
it's just a really really valuable conversation
3:01
and there are numerous things. He's actually
3:03
working on a project in machine learning
3:05
and so we actually wanted to get
3:07
to a conversation about AI that
3:10
we didn't really get to dig into so
3:12
I might be having him on again at
3:14
some point because I just think there's still
3:16
plenty of things that we could have talked
3:18
about. But this one is just a fantastic
3:20
rip. I will have links and
3:22
show notes, links and details in the show notes so that
3:25
you can check them out and I
3:27
hope you enjoy this one. This is chat
3:29
113, China's surveillance state,
3:32
CBDCs, the shifting
3:34
paradigms, and the Bitcoin
3:36
wild card with Roger Huang. Roger,
3:43
welcome to the show man. It's really
3:45
really good to have you. We read your
3:47
piece, I guess it's been a month or
3:49
so back now, it's been a little bit
3:52
and your book actually
3:55
has been on my list. I haven't
3:57
really gotten through many books lately. The
3:59
only thing I've been able to consume
4:01
in mass is audiobooks and
4:03
I'm still on a book about thorium actually right
4:05
now but I've got you I've got you in
4:07
my list and I'm really excited about this one
4:10
because I mean as I just said I've
4:12
always felt like the the
4:16
perspective and kind of what's going on in
4:18
China related to Bitcoin has always been like
4:21
a big blind spot for me you know
4:23
the and it's been really
4:25
interesting to see because the the mining
4:27
ban and everything was huge it was
4:29
such a big thing in
4:32
kind of showing the resiliency of
4:34
Bitcoin but from
4:37
from that so so the book by the way for
4:40
anybody listening is would now
4:42
hold Bitcoin and you also
4:44
do a lot of writing on technical
4:47
stuff you've got a piece
4:49
that I read about privacy
4:51
and the samurai wallet guys
4:53
and stuff I think I was in Forbes that
4:56
was a for example they basically there's a
4:58
preface that I just want to say welcome to
5:00
the show man it's really good to have you
5:02
and I think there's going to be a lot
5:04
of things that we can cover in this conversation
5:06
yeah thanks no appreciate it really love to be
5:09
on the show listen to like several episodes and
5:12
yeah a fan of the show so just happy to be here hell
5:14
yeah I love the Bitcoin propaganda department hat by
5:17
the way I'm doing so much free advertising for
5:19
Vanek like but it does like it does feel
5:21
like kind of my vibe and you know what
5:23
I've been doing and I should probably do the
5:25
opposite as I go on the Bitcoin shows and
5:27
I wear the hat and then sometimes when non-bitcoin
5:29
shows I get a little bit shy but
5:31
I feel like I should probably do both I
5:34
should do both you should overdo it you should
5:36
overdo it you should make it even more obnoxious
5:38
for the for the non-bitcoin shows like all the
5:40
yeah because I have like all these like geopolitics
5:43
and like Asia shows and they're like please introduce
5:45
Bitcoin Taiwan and then like I kind of have
5:47
to struggle between like do I should I be
5:49
like a normal looking person for a bit you
5:52
should like pull like Bitcoin you know and so
5:54
it's a mix but yeah no I'm glad to
5:56
bring the hat and yeah Vanek if
5:58
you could uh throw some sats
6:00
my way, let me know. I'm wearing the
6:02
hat like everywhere. But yeah, yeah. That's
6:05
funny. So I'm
6:07
curious actually before we start out, what
6:11
is your, what's
6:13
your favorite topic to cover
6:16
around Bitcoin? Yeah.
6:18
What's your deepest thing to dig into that you
6:20
wish everybody would ask you about? Yeah,
6:23
no, it's a really good question. I think
6:26
like I started writing about like a
6:28
lot of like Bitcoin and human rights
6:30
kind of issues pretty early. So
6:32
I've been writing about Bitcoin since 2014. And
6:35
I've really been trying to research and during
6:37
the Hong Kong protests, actually, I was like
6:39
on the ground, like while protests were happening,
6:41
I was trying to find like, Oh, that's
6:43
crazy. Yeah, yeah. I mean, it
6:45
was it was during a week where the
6:47
protests were a little bit more dull down,
6:50
because that was when Taiwan's president, Tainh
6:52
Nguyen got reelected. And
6:55
so everybody from Hong Kong kind of like vacated. So
6:57
I was like the one week where I was like,
7:00
I'm gonna go, I'm gonna come, I'm gonna check out what's going
7:02
on. But I met some really
7:04
cool people like in the Bitcoin scene in Hong Kong, who
7:06
are still, you know, like, friends
7:09
and, you know, people that
7:11
I talked to every day these days. So
7:13
that was really cool. But
7:15
yeah, like, that was always a focus of
7:17
mine. And it was almost
7:19
like seeing where there were states of exception,
7:22
and where Bitcoin fits into that. So like, for example,
7:25
I wrote about Bangladesh, and
7:28
about how they took down the
7:30
internet, in order to prevent videos
7:32
of atrocity. So short story, there's
7:35
the student protesters, and
7:37
then the military, the Bangladeshi military
7:39
kind of went in and hundreds
7:41
of them died. And at one
7:43
point, they took down like all
7:45
social media, all social networks,
7:49
just like the entire internet was down. And
7:51
the whole point was so that people can like
7:54
communicate with each other and can like share what
7:56
was happening. And then by the time that kind
7:58
of lifted, Then
8:01
you had all the casualty reports and stuff like that. So
8:03
I've always been thinking about where do
8:06
you see Bitcoin meet the Navalny
8:08
Foundation, for example, they had
8:10
to raise money in Bitcoin because they
8:13
couldn't use the
8:15
Russian banking system. The Feminist
8:17
Coalition of Nigeria had to
8:19
use Bitcoin because the central bank co-opted
8:22
their domestic payment processor. So
8:24
whenever, that's what I love to
8:26
write about. It's like where the
8:29
metal hits the ground kind of thing.
8:31
Because I think Bitcoiners, I
8:34
love being in the community. I think we
8:36
sometimes, I think it's great, it's a great
8:38
instinct, but over-index on the security
8:41
threats. I feel like Bitcoiners are very
8:43
sophisticated, or at least, I
8:45
mean, I'm biased, I go to the Bit devs and stuff like
8:47
that. So maybe it's like the crowd of Bitcoiners I'm with. But
8:50
regardless, people are very sophisticated
8:53
about knowing their threat models.
8:56
However, the people
8:59
who probably need that knowledge the most
9:01
don't necessarily have it. So
9:03
when you have these human rights situations
9:06
where it's like people can't get their
9:08
money out, they're censored immediately, it's like
9:10
a really urgent situation. So that's where
9:12
I've always tried to figure it out.
9:14
And you read my article about how
9:17
Bitcoins are about China's bans. So I'm
9:19
always thinking about if there's a mass
9:21
protest, if there are things
9:24
that happen with the government's trying to censor
9:26
the way that you transact and the way
9:28
that you act because of the fact that
9:30
you're dissenting, what does that look like? And
9:34
Noster also plays a huge role in this because a lot
9:36
of- Oh yeah, for sure. Yeah. I
9:39
don't want to say a huge amount, but
9:41
there's quite a big audience in
9:44
China that downloaded Domus. No
9:46
kidding. Yeah, yeah. It was, yeah,
9:48
yeah. They got like onboarded and a few of them
9:50
have stayed like a couple, a lot of the accounts,
9:53
it kind of goes up and down, but there's still quite
9:56
a few people who post. That's just kind of cool to
9:58
see as well. So yeah, that's like the one. one thing
10:00
I wish, you know, that was kind of like when I
10:02
first got down the rabbit hole. And
10:05
I still try to write about that. And
10:07
I would kind of describe it as like trying
10:10
to find connections to FreedomTech
10:14
in these situations. So like during the Hong Kong
10:16
situation, kind of like what I described, I went
10:18
to Hong Kong and I was trying to find
10:20
out like, hey, was there like interplay between
10:23
the protesters and between Bitcoin
10:25
or FreedomTech tools and things like that, just to see.
10:29
And, you know, there were some intersections, but not
10:31
as many as you would expect. I can go
10:33
into more into the details, but my
10:36
whole kind of research thread has been
10:38
on like, where
10:40
does this kind of meet? And so,
10:42
you know, you have events like Oslo, for example, where
10:44
that kind of happens, but I still
10:46
see a little bit of a gap between the
10:48
activists and the FreedomTech. So yeah, that
10:50
was probably a really long answer. But
10:52
now, to sum it up, to sum
10:54
it up, like I think the one
10:56
thing is just really like when you
10:58
have these crisis situations, I mean, this
11:01
trucker protest, for example, Canada, that might
11:03
be an example. I was actually about
11:05
to bring it up. Yeah. Yeah. I
11:07
have thoughts on that too. But anyways,
11:09
I am Canadian, unfortunately, or for you.
11:11
It's okay, we forgive you. Yeah, yeah.
11:14
Glad to be forgiven.
11:18
Definitely not running for Canadian politics
11:20
anytime soon without much I mouth
11:22
off Canada. But you
11:25
know, the be so screwed so fast. I
11:28
know, I know, I know. Because they're so yeah,
11:30
I mean, that's like a hole in the rabbit
11:32
hole. I'll let me stay focused on
11:34
this one first. But
11:36
yeah, no, like the whole
11:38
thing is like when you have these state I think
11:40
it's just gonna like more and more people will encounter
11:43
that as we go. And
11:46
people will start to realize, you
11:48
know, why censorship resistance really matters. It's
11:51
a lack of a better word. Yeah.
11:54
Speaking of the trucker protest is being
11:56
I was kind
11:58
of connected to that. and during
12:02
all of that was unfolding and it
12:04
was funny is being kind
12:06
of close to it. It was interesting
12:09
to see how many
12:12
of the kind of the seemingly simple
12:14
side of just like what do you
12:16
do with it. We
12:20
did not have an action plan for
12:22
you know. I saw
12:24
it as it was a combination of
12:28
like a huge success in showing how
12:30
powerful Bitcoin was that you could send
12:33
it without someone stopping it you know.
12:35
Like you couldn't freeze the account. You
12:37
can't go, you can't stop
12:39
the go fund me of
12:42
the Bitcoin heading into Canada and it
12:44
all basically made it there. And
12:46
in fact one of the things that I think
12:49
they really don't appreciate because a lot of people
12:51
like oh because there was no privacy they
12:53
you know just watch these addresses and
12:55
stuff because you know on a tally
12:58
coin it was visible the addresses. But
13:00
one thing that I found was really interesting
13:03
just because I was kind of aware of
13:05
the the size of
13:08
funds that moved to different locations is
13:10
they explicitly didn't mention anything in any
13:13
of the memos or in any of
13:15
the watch these
13:17
addresses or anything about the lightning
13:20
that went there and a significant
13:22
amount of funds went over lightning.
13:24
And I thought that was interesting
13:27
that it wasn't like a lookout
13:29
for this. We're you know not
13:32
totally aware of how this would come in
13:34
but watch for payments from these places. Like
13:36
they just kind of like it
13:38
almost gave the appearance that the government was
13:40
trying to brag about the fact that we
13:43
can still see into this and still control
13:45
this. And they explicitly ignored
13:47
the things that were going to make it
13:49
like they didn't have omnipotence
13:51
over the situation. And a
13:54
lot of funds made it to them but then a
13:56
lot of funds did get deposited into exchange
13:59
accounts. and then frozen. I can't
14:01
remember the exact ratio. But
14:04
it certainly wasn't like 99% got
14:06
to the truckers, and that's what I would hope
14:08
to see. And
14:12
so because of that, in
14:14
fact, it wasn't short, it was shortly after that that
14:17
I had the idea just,
14:19
and this might actually be something that
14:21
you would be fascinating to just
14:24
be awesome to have you as a part of if this
14:26
ever, and you know, I'm just gonna throw
14:28
this idea out there, just so that somebody
14:30
else can maybe bring it to fruition, because
14:33
I don't have the time to bring it
14:35
to fruition. But I bought the URL BTC
14:37
war games with the idea of basically
14:40
playing a red
14:42
team, blue team. All right, how do we get
14:44
these people in this area of Bitcoin? Where
14:47
is it going to fail? How can
14:49
they use it? And just look at
14:52
explicitly what we have available to us,
14:54
and then kind of build packages, so
14:56
to speak of like, this is the
14:58
tool you want to use. This is
15:01
how you get around this block or
15:03
whatever. And, you
15:05
know, in what scenario, what can you use,
15:07
and then just basically build little
15:11
roadmaps for how to react to
15:14
certain, quote unquote, real world attacks.
15:16
Because like you say, you know,
15:18
there's a lot of sophistication about like, are they
15:20
going to spam? Are they going to do a
15:22
time warp attack? You know, like all of this
15:24
stuff about the lightning network and payments and cryptography.
15:27
But we forget about just how do you get
15:29
Bitcoin to somebody on the ground and in
15:32
a way that they can use it? You know,
15:35
it's a far more meat space problem than
15:37
it is a cybersecurity
15:39
problem, so to speak. So,
15:42
no, that's awesome. That's it's
15:45
definitely like a big topic. And
15:47
in fact, on that Hong Kong,
15:51
I would love to know more about what
15:53
happened in Hong Kong. It seemed like there
15:55
was a huge, like there was so much
15:58
on the internet. unfolding
16:01
and the military was coming in, there
16:03
were tanks rolling across the border. It's
16:07
one of those things that you see in politics a lot
16:10
where they're like these pseudo like, oh,
16:13
things have just changed hands,
16:15
but nothing really bad happened, but
16:18
you clearly see that the
16:20
power has shifted. It's
16:22
just the facade of, you're still in
16:25
charge, don't worry about it. And it's
16:27
like, yeah, but no, you're
16:29
clearly not. They're just doing
16:31
what the other person wants. So I'm curious
16:33
the breakdown of the situation, like what was
16:35
the totality
16:38
of the outcome there
16:40
in from your perspective and how did Bitcoin
16:42
play a role and is it still playing
16:44
a role in Hong Kong? Yeah,
16:47
no, I think it's a great
16:49
question. So
16:51
I've been following Hong Kong for a while.
16:53
I used to
16:55
go there pretty often. And
16:57
the reason why is because it was
17:00
at least one place in Asia where there's
17:02
not the great, well, close to China where
17:04
there's not the great firewall. I used to
17:07
go back and forth pretty often and then
17:09
I stopped to work, so I was just
17:11
annoyed by the fact that I had
17:14
the great firewall. But yeah,
17:16
I've never lived there for a very
17:18
long time, but I spent
17:21
some time in the city. I was there
17:23
during both protests. So there were two protests, actually.
17:25
There was one in 2014 and then
17:28
there was one in 2019. And
17:31
so I think what
17:33
ended up happening with the latest Hong
17:35
Kong protest, and it's really
17:37
a sign of how governments use these
17:39
states of crisis in order to make
17:42
things disappear, is then
17:44
COVID happened and
17:46
then they started implementing
17:48
restrictions. But it was
17:50
very obvious that the
17:52
targeting was towards disrupting. The idea was,
17:54
A, you can't organize anymore around you
18:00
know, you can't be doing this because there's
18:02
COVID, right? But they were
18:05
really trying to go after like, you know,
18:07
there would be like government assemblies, right? Like
18:09
people in the government would go actually, that
18:11
was one of the mass spreader events in
18:13
Hong Kong, if I remember correctly, was like
18:15
legislators went into a restaurant together. And that
18:17
was not like a priority for the Hong Kong police
18:20
to enforce, right? For like, pandemic reasons. But then you
18:22
saw like, oh, like anything that's
18:24
like protest related, you know, and China
18:27
did this in the mainland as well,
18:29
like they basically use COVID-19 restrictions. There
18:31
were these bank protests, for example. And
18:34
then one of the freakiest things was
18:36
they turned their like COVID QR codes,
18:38
read, like all the protesters, they
18:40
specifically targeted people who have been protesting and
18:42
just said like, you can't go out. So
18:44
like a version of that, maybe not as
18:46
like targeted as the way I described the
18:49
bank protests in China, but like a version
18:51
of that sort of happened in Hong Kong,
18:53
and that took all the energy out. And
18:55
I think that's like something to learn is
18:58
like states will use, you know, pandemic war,
19:00
like the states of exception, in order
19:03
to create new powers and
19:07
enforce them for their goals.
19:10
And in this case, I think the pandemic really took
19:13
the sales out of the protest movement. And
19:15
then they started, they implemented the new national
19:18
security law. And the new national security law
19:21
basically allows them so Hong
19:24
Kong, the original reason why they were protests
19:26
was because Hong Kong has a system, it's
19:28
called one country, two
19:31
systems. And the way it
19:33
works is that when there was
19:35
a handover, the United Kingdom gave
19:37
back Hong Kong to China in
19:40
1997. And as
19:42
part of that deal, there
19:44
was until 2047, where Hong Kong could
19:46
still run its own kind of government
19:48
separate from the mainland. Okay.
19:51
And so it's administered differently. So in Hong
19:53
Kong, there were like, newspapers
19:55
and journalists that were adversarial
19:57
to the Chinese Communist Party.
20:00
party, especially Apple Daily, Stan
20:02
News and a couple of other places. And
20:06
so Hong Kong was definitely like, the
20:08
mainland still had, you know, for example, they
20:10
kind of rigged it in a way. So
20:13
Hong Kong's leaders called the chief executives. Just
20:17
kind of badass. But
20:21
unfortunately, I mean, Hong Kong, one of the sad
20:23
things about is like Hong Kong is like really
20:25
cool in other ways. Like it's a free port.
20:28
There's like 0% tax. Like they're very like,
20:30
you know, like actually the government
20:33
itself, like the bureaucracy is like
20:36
reasonably well managed, right? Like you want to get
20:38
documents, you want to get stuff like that, you
20:40
can get it back. That's
20:42
a shocker. You
20:45
know, yeah, for some of us in some governments, right? It's
20:47
like, hey, I'm trying to fill out a form, I'll come
20:49
back in 80 days. Like the Hong Kong government's like from
20:52
everyone I've talked to and I've also dealt with them a few times.
20:55
Like they're reasonably efficient, like
20:57
which is kind of a shocker. It's very like Singapore
20:59
in that respect, right? Like they have like a lot
21:01
of like political controls. But like if you deal with
21:04
the government, they do actually like hold their
21:06
end of the bargain when it comes to like, getting
21:08
forms, files, like the taxes are relatively
21:10
low, they're like pretty business friendly in
21:12
some ways. But
21:15
unfortunately, their political control is
21:18
under the Chinese Communist
21:20
Party, right? Like basically, the chief executive
21:22
is appointed, it's kind of
21:24
this like weird semi democracy, it's
21:26
not universal suffrage. So the original
21:28
protests were like, let us elect
21:30
our chief executive, fully
21:33
universal suffrage, because the way it worked is like you
21:35
had 50% functional
21:38
constituencies and 50% like
21:40
votes by people. But the
21:43
functional constituencies are like Chinese
21:46
traditional medicine or like it's like experts that
21:48
are convened by the Chinese government. And so
21:50
essentially, the chief executive the election for like
21:52
the leader Hong Kong was rigged. Yeah,
21:55
explicitly rigged. It was built
21:57
in to be rigged. be
22:00
rigged. And so, effectively, and
22:02
China chooses the nominees. So,
22:06
like, in basically, like, anyways,
22:08
it's like, basically, basically
22:10
chosen by China. And
22:12
then the protests were all about, like, against
22:14
that. And then there was the back and
22:16
forth and everything like that. The protests lost
22:18
wind, China passed what was called the national
22:21
security law through, like, kind of a backdoor
22:23
into the, effectively,
22:25
what happened was that the there was
22:27
like a faction that was called the
22:29
pan Democrats and there was a faction
22:31
as pro China. I'm being very, like,
22:33
broad strokes here. But the Democrats all
22:35
resigned on mass. And so now the
22:37
Legislative Council is all basically
22:41
people who are pro CCP, effectively.
22:43
And then also the local government,
22:46
they like arrested a lot of
22:48
the people who ran, there was
22:50
like a primary where all the
22:52
Democrats got together and created
22:55
a primary election for
22:57
their candidates to run for the
22:59
next election for their
23:01
equivalent of Congress. And
23:04
like a lot of the organizers, a lot of people who
23:06
ran for the primaries were arrested, they're called the Hong Kong
23:08
47. And so they're
23:10
continue to be in jail. They
23:13
shut down the free press.
23:15
So Apple News, Jimmy
23:17
Lai, who founded it is now in prison
23:20
for conceivably for the rest of his life. They
23:22
also just recently had trials for Stan
23:24
News for publishing op ads, critical
23:27
of the Chinese
23:29
Communist Party, effectively. There
23:32
used to be tenement square rallies in Victoria
23:34
Park, 200,000 people would attend. And
23:36
they've imprisoned the organizer of that. It's kind
23:39
of been really sad. I mean, I'm actually just talking about
23:41
it from like a non political standpoint for a second, like,
23:43
I know a lot of friends from Hong Kong. They
23:46
all know someone who's been imprisoned, even
23:49
though, you know, they're not necessarily
23:51
political in that sense. So that's kind of like
23:53
what happened. You know, I went and I
23:56
was trying to find out if like Bitcoin played a big role.
23:59
And there were like some small things like for example Hong
24:01
Kong Free Press at one
24:03
point raised money through a BTC pay server.
24:06
And Hong Kong Free Press was kind of like one
24:08
of the more pro-democracy outlets. It was probably one of
24:10
the ones that was like maybe
24:13
had the risk of being like had all its founders arrested.
24:15
They did a lot of things and continue to do a
24:17
lot of things to make sure they tell the lie now.
24:21
It helps that they publish in English and not
24:23
like Mandarin and Cantonese I think in
24:25
that respect. But
24:28
they used to raise money. There was like
24:30
a couple of the like OTC
24:33
desks like one of them actually
24:35
raised funds to protesters but like in Bitcoin Cash.
24:37
So they were like handing out water bottles that
24:40
said like this was funded by Bitcoin
24:42
Cash not Bitcoin but you know still
24:44
that was like kind of a link
24:46
the OTC desks. But it was
24:49
kind of funny because I interviewed them about it and
24:51
then I actually wrote an article because I interviewed them
24:54
and I was like hey were there any like you
24:56
know because they split the
24:58
city into two. There was like yellow and blue
25:00
and the whole idea was like if you were
25:02
a blue business you supported the police. And then
25:05
if you were a yellow business you supported the
25:07
protesters. And so you'd have restaurants that would put
25:09
like yellow signs on their thing
25:12
and it would just show that like hey you're among like
25:15
allies of the protesters or whatever. So like people would
25:17
go they would choose to go to yellow restaurants right.
25:19
They would choose not to go to blue restaurants if
25:21
they were hand democrat. If they supported the
25:23
police it was like kind of the opposite right. And then
25:25
what happened was
25:31
like you know some of the OTC desks
25:33
they were like yellow you know they like
25:35
supported they raised funds and stuff like that.
25:38
But someone told me that I wrote an
25:40
article about one of them doing this. And
25:42
then someone told me that after I wrote
25:44
that article they refused to do any press
25:47
from that. I don't know. I don't know
25:50
that that article I wrote about the whole
25:52
like raising funds of Bitcoin cash did them
25:54
a lot of favors. I
25:56
think maybe there was some tension
25:58
there. I did talk to some of the exchanges that
26:00
were based in Hong Kong and it was asking them
26:03
if there was some like, you know, increases in price.
26:05
Because one of the things that was interesting about the
26:07
protests was like, they very much
26:09
were like, our way of protesting is through
26:11
economic exit. We want to exit the Hong
26:13
Kong dollar, we want to buy US dollars,
26:16
right? And then there were protesters that were
26:18
very aware of like the digital surveillance. So
26:20
they have these things called octopus cards, which
26:22
are like similar to public transit cards, like
26:26
anywhere in New York City or like the MetroCard
26:28
or DC card or whatever. And people
26:30
stopped using them because they knew that the police
26:32
were tracking their movements through the usage of these
26:34
cards. And so more and
26:36
more they were paying cash through,
26:39
you know, through
26:42
these systems. And then Hong Kong
26:44
like VPNs, like Signal, like encrypted
26:46
chat, all of it kind of like
26:48
the downloads kept on going up because people were really
26:50
afraid and I think some of them still are that
26:54
like the great firewall was going to extend into Hong
26:56
Kong. So that still hasn't happened in full, like you
26:58
can still access like Google and things without a VPN
27:00
in Hong Kong. But there was that
27:02
fear. And so people started getting more sophisticated about
27:04
the technology they were using. And
27:08
there have been like one or two Hong
27:10
Kong kind of like, I guess you could
27:12
say dissenting groups that use Bitcoin or have
27:14
done Bitcoin trainings. I don't want to say
27:16
they use Bitcoin, they use Bitcoin, they have
27:18
Bitcoin trainings. But yeah, it was surprising to
27:20
me, I don't think like there was much
27:22
as much like explicit movement, if that makes
27:24
sense. Like given how all the trend lines
27:26
seem to line up. Like I was always
27:28
like, from my perspective, right as
27:30
a Bitcoiner, I was always like, this seems
27:33
like the perfect ingredient. Like you have people
27:35
who are like, we want to voice our
27:37
descent by like exiting money
27:39
into Bitcoin, right. And
27:42
then, you know, you
27:44
had like this increasing awareness of like
27:46
digital surveillance, digital privacy, you
27:48
know, that you had to control your
27:51
own means of communication, you had to
27:53
get on Signal, you had to
27:55
get on all these other tools, because you know,
27:57
maybe the great firewall restrict you from communicating a
27:59
certain way. But there
28:01
wasn't as much. So I wrote an article that
28:03
was based on a couple of sources that showed
28:05
that there was more exchange volume on
28:08
Bitcoin. But like, for example,
28:10
just to give you some quick examples, like Bitcoin
28:12
ATM volume actually went down. And I think some
28:14
of the physical OTC desk reported that volume was
28:16
down. Cause so many people were protesting. It's
28:19
like one of those like, duh moments. You're like,
28:21
oh, it was more demand for Bitcoin in the
28:23
streets. But you're like, no, like they're also consumed
28:25
by protesting that like, no, and it's trying to
28:27
buy Bitcoin right away. So I
28:30
think there is like some
28:32
roots of that. I know that people
28:34
in Hong Kong are more aware because
28:36
one of the things that happened was
28:38
HSBC, for example, like preliminarily
28:41
froze accounts. They weren't
28:43
even like called on by the police to do
28:45
so. They literally like selected some
28:47
quote unquote risky accounts and they were like,
28:49
we're going to proactively shut these down. I
28:51
mean, there's also something that other states do.
28:54
Thanks for such shit. I just, yeah, I
28:56
know. I know it's such, it's such bullshit,
28:59
but so I think there's that awareness. It's
29:02
almost like one of the things I would say is like, I
29:04
think there are some Hong Kongers like
29:06
on Noster, there's some Bitcoiners, there's the
29:08
Hong Kong, from what I've heard, the
29:10
Hong Kong Bitcoin Association isn't necessarily like
29:12
super active, but there's like a super
29:14
active like
29:17
Bitcoin OTC scene, right? There's
29:20
like a thousand OTC shops. I was
29:22
just talking to someone who
29:25
like Hashki, I'm actually going to have the article
29:27
out pretty soon. They're one of the like three
29:29
licensed exchange providers. So there's a lot of activity
29:31
there. You can go there, go to
29:34
like a mall, trade Bitcoin for cash. And
29:36
I've talked to some people who have like
29:38
gone through that experience and like people are
29:40
trading like massive amounts of like cash for
29:42
lightning. They even transact in lightning, which is
29:45
kind of cool. You know, you can go there with Hong
29:47
Kong dollars, you can get like lightning back. Well,
29:51
you can get sad like through lightning. Yeah. I
29:53
mean, I've always thought that would be a really
29:56
interesting way to quote unquote, onboard people is accept
29:58
cash and then give change back. And
30:00
I'm surprised that that isn't like
30:03
more common. Like that hasn't become like
30:05
a thing. I always thought that would
30:07
be a fun idea, but as hard
30:10
as that, I guess that would probably be like
30:12
buying Bitcoin and then you immediately become an exchange
30:14
and all this crap. Yeah,
30:16
well in Hong Kong, that's like the default way. There's
30:18
like a lot of people doing that. There's like a
30:20
thousand shops. That's cool. With like really low fee rates.
30:23
So that's like, that's basically a standard though. Like that's
30:25
a... Yeah, there's all of the places.
30:27
It's actually like a mall where there's like dozens
30:30
of these all in one. That's cool. It's
30:32
like an OTC mall. Yeah, they also trade other...
30:35
I mean, I think about Hong Kong is like
30:37
it's very like web three crypto. So they all
30:39
trade other like, I mean, for
30:41
lack of like shit coins, they trade a lot. I mean, I
30:43
am sleep, but there is a lot
30:45
of space. You're totally free to call them shit coins on
30:48
my show. Yeah, I know. I know. I
30:50
got it. Yeah. I've been wondering about
30:52
that. Cause like my book says, cause I had a few people who
30:54
like bought it and they're like, Oh, I'm part of...
30:56
Cause you know, Chinese people are very, how do I put this? Like
30:58
a lot of them are like more crypto leaning.
31:02
I'll get into that a little bit, but they
31:06
buy it and I'm like, I wonder how they'll think about it
31:08
because like within like, I say like blockchain
31:10
is bullshit. And I say like, there's
31:13
so many shit coins. And then I go in all
31:15
these spaces with Chinese people and they're always talking about
31:17
all the blockchain projects they're invested in and like also
31:19
all the tokens they're in. And I'm just like, I
31:21
was just in a Twitter space yesterday. It was a
31:24
Mandarin one and people were like, Oh
31:26
my God, you're such an OG. You like
31:28
invested in plus token. So plus token was this
31:30
massive Ponzi and it's still so embarrassing
31:32
for people in China. But you know why it's so
31:34
embarrassing for people in China? It's this like high
31:37
school teacher who has like no, I
31:40
didn't even explain it to English, like, but
31:42
like no like culture, like
31:44
stole money from all these,
31:46
like Shanghai, Beijing, sophisticated technical
31:48
analysis investors or whatever. That's
31:51
what pisses them off more than anything else. Yeah,
31:53
like they're all talking about like plus token and
31:55
they're talking about Neo and all these tokens and
31:57
stuff like that. So yeah, I'm all for that.
32:00
I wonder how some Chinese people receive
32:02
the book. Literally it says shit coins
32:04
in print, I think seven or eight
32:06
times. It says blockchain is complete bullshit.
32:08
I was talking to this one guy
32:10
and he's talking to me, he's at
32:12
a Bitcoin meetup, he's like, oh,
32:15
I've got a blockchain carbon project. And
32:18
he's like, I really want to buy your book, I really want
32:20
to support it. He's like this older Chinese guy, he's talking to
32:22
me in Mandarin. I think it's a great conversation, I'm like, damn,
32:25
I know he's not gonna love it. It's
32:28
like a few chapters in, he's just gonna be like, wait,
32:30
this guy just literally called my life's work bullshit. But
32:33
anyway, so there's definitely
32:36
like, yeah, that's a whole other thread that we can
32:38
get into. But going back to Hong Kong,
32:40
there is that kind of trade, but
32:42
that's what I've been trying to tell people too,
32:44
because I think people have this narrative and it's
32:46
cleaner to be like, oh my
32:48
God, people are resisting
32:50
the government, so they're gonna put all their
32:52
savings into Bitcoin. But
32:55
that's not necessarily what's happening as much,
32:58
you know what I'm saying? For
33:00
some of the Hong Kong groups, for example,
33:02
Hong Kong Free Press used to take Bitcoin,
33:04
now they take BAT or whatever. And
33:07
then I think there was some Hong Kong
33:09
groups that were thinking about using Bitcoin. The
33:11
thing is, they're already taking a massive amount
33:13
of risk by being
33:16
dissenting, they're probably already in violation
33:18
of law. Just by being there
33:20
and publishing. Exactly. And so
33:22
it's like, they wanna take a double risk
33:24
and like double dip and kind of like
33:27
also be accused of money laundering or things
33:29
like that. So I think that's their concern.
33:32
It could be a very
33:35
easy attack vector to then
33:37
say, if you're just barely
33:39
skirting by, you're just painting
33:41
a flat, putting a big
33:44
red target on yourself of
33:46
being like, also, by the way, there's
33:49
a really easy way to twist this
33:52
other hundred list of laws to just put
33:54
us all in cages. Yeah, that's a good
33:56
point. And I mean, for them, I
33:58
mean, for lack of... sympathy for this
34:00
because I'm kind of like in between but I
34:02
have the luxury of being in between right like
34:05
they are like the US and Canada like they
34:07
they're like some of them are refugees there right
34:09
they're on there on the on the program like
34:11
they had to leave Hong Kong and
34:14
you know so there's like reliance on
34:16
the US banking system or like Canadian banking system
34:18
I don't think they're naive about like it
34:21
not necessarily happening again but you know when
34:23
the protesters were thinking about protesting they weren't
34:25
thinking like let's go it's a Bitcoin they
34:27
were thinking like much more like oh the
34:30
US is like you know like
34:32
our haven if that makes sense
34:34
so there is some of that but just
34:37
to tie it all together what I've been telling trying to tell
34:39
people is like you
34:41
know and people will say oh it's just
34:43
Chinese people investing in shitcoins and things like
34:45
that but the reality is that like China's
34:48
biggest fear is people exiting money
34:50
out of the system like in a way
34:52
that they can't control right like the Chinese
34:54
system is very strict about like the amount
34:56
of money Xi Jinping himself I don't even
34:58
actually think this is like a wise economic
35:00
decision he's like such a big fan of
35:02
like a strong yen he's like
35:05
a strong yen is strong
35:08
guy are you ready to be banned from China no I'm
35:10
kidding but like a
35:12
strong you and like he's such a like you
35:14
know I just think he doesn't know
35:16
anything about economics at all but he
35:19
he's just like a strong yen is such
35:21
an important part of China's economic policy right
35:23
and so people exiting money into
35:26
the system you know in the Chinese like the
35:28
the Chinese party state is kind of saying like
35:30
oh it's all gambling and all this stuff right
35:33
and to a certain degree as a as a Bitcoin
35:35
or in these spaces I do actually kind of agree
35:37
but I think there
35:40
it's like a more meaningful way of the set
35:42
because what what people are actually saying right regardless
35:44
of whether or not like you know I think
35:46
the clean narrative is to be like oh
35:49
and that was like the kind of narrative I was looking for
35:51
at the beginning when I was doing my research and the clean
35:53
thing would have been like you get a bunch of people who
35:55
are like oh I don't
35:57
want like China to take over
35:59
all my choices. So therefore, I
36:02
will like Orange Pillow myself and get onto Bitcoin.
36:04
And I was thinking like maybe that's a simple
36:06
version of the story. So that's the easy narrative.
36:08
Yeah, but that's not what it is. Like people
36:10
don't find and also like, I find also there's
36:13
Chinese people are like all kinds of I try
36:15
to like, you know, Chinese people separate from the
36:17
state. There's many different types of Chinese people. But
36:19
in general, one thing I find is that a
36:21
lot of Chinese people are very like, Jan, they're
36:24
very sharp about like making money. They're like very
36:26
practical. And so not
36:28
a lot of them are going to go to Bitcoin because it's resistance
36:30
money. And, and
36:32
like, no offense if it's
36:34
billed to them as resistance money, as much as I love the
36:37
book, I did a review of it, just like
36:39
if noster is billed to them as like resistance network,
36:42
that actually is probably like a counter
36:44
effect. But if noster is like
36:46
a fun place where they can make their own
36:48
choices, and they don't have to be censored, and
36:51
it doesn't require a phone number to register, which
36:53
is a very important thing in China, and you
36:55
don't need to download an app, because
36:57
the you know, the Chinese app store is
37:00
very monitored and censored, then
37:02
that's how that works. Same thing with Bitcoin. It's
37:04
like, if it's a way for
37:06
me to get money out of the system, and
37:09
it's a way for me to make return, because that's
37:11
actually like a really big thing right now is like,
37:14
people in China, they have like nowhere to turn with
37:16
their money. Like the economy is like
37:18
really in a kind of a struggle. I mean, it's
37:20
a relative struggle. China is projected to
37:22
struggle to grow to 5% GDP
37:24
growth. That sounds amazing from an American
37:26
perspective. But it would be the slowest
37:28
economic growth since 1976. Yeah, the
37:31
youth in China, there's a high youth
37:33
unemployment rate right now. And
37:35
a lot of young people are struggling with this
37:37
existential question of like, how do I even make
37:39
a livelihood? Right. And
37:42
so there are a lot of
37:44
these like, hey, like if you
37:47
are getting into Bitcoin, you
37:49
know, and there's a lot of Chinese people
37:51
who are doing getting into Bitcoin, through that
37:53
route, they're building businesses, they're buying Bitcoin, they're
37:56
buying tether. I mean, a
37:58
lot of it's also tether as well. but they're
38:01
getting into this alternative economy and
38:05
that is kind of like, I think,
38:07
a way of powering through. As a
38:10
result of that though, you may have
38:12
noticed like runes and ordinals and all
38:14
BRC-20 activity is very heavy
38:17
in China. I think it's like an Asia
38:19
writ large. Gotcha. And
38:21
I spent some time looking
38:23
through that. I mean, the
38:25
thing I hope is
38:28
like this is from my point of view because
38:30
I had the research and the research is just
38:32
like you see what's observed. But
38:34
then from my POV, I think
38:37
what it is is that like the easy way to
38:39
onboard the next like 100
38:42
million or 200 million people, they're already kind of already there
38:45
is by offering all these different
38:47
options, right? BRC-20, the
38:49
tokens or whatever. I generally think
38:51
some of them are going to go to zero
38:53
really quick, but there
38:56
is a lot of activity related to that. My
38:59
hope is that the people who onboard onto that,
39:01
they realize like, hey, this is like a totally
39:03
different economy, totally different way of thinking. And
39:06
I've started talking to some people in China
39:08
or who have left China who are based
39:10
in the Chinese system who are like, hey,
39:13
like we're used to just like mindlessly paying
39:15
with like WeChat pay and Ali pay, right?
39:17
And now it's like, I want to
39:20
do all my payments through LinkedIn. Now there's
39:22
not like a ton of these people, I
39:24
have to say. But I think
39:26
like, the more and more you get exposure
39:28
because the hope is that like the more you're
39:30
like, hey, like Bitcoin gives you
39:33
more choices, it allows you to do what
39:35
you want to do with your money. Like
39:38
the government can't tell you not
39:41
to invest in, you know,
39:44
butt coin or whatever, or whatever BRC-20,
39:46
right? That's like a really powerful thing
39:48
for Chinese people. Because
39:51
they're otherwise so restricted, they can't get money out
39:53
of the country. They can't invest in like different
39:55
things. They have to invest in certain stock
39:58
markets, or they have to- invest in Chinese real estate,
40:00
but all these things are going down. And
40:03
the hope is that almost
40:06
like using
40:08
Bitcoin and using it changes them because
40:10
they realize then they have
40:13
more choices in all different things. And
40:15
that the privacy... So the
40:17
one thing is that I think a lot of
40:19
Chinese people are very aware of the privacy implications
40:21
because their phone numbers are registered to a real
40:23
life SMS. It's not like, I mean, in
40:25
Europe, for example, it's the same thing. But
40:28
people do act on that. I have a story
40:30
like there was someone I
40:32
knew who was making calls overseas and someone
40:35
called them and said, stop making calls overseas.
40:38
The Chinese system is very monitored from
40:40
a telecoms perspective. The
40:43
most important thing that you can do
40:45
in order to secure your Bitcoin is
40:47
to use a secure, trusted,
40:49
long running hardware wallet in the
40:52
Bitcoin space and do one that
40:54
is Bitcoin only like the cold
40:56
card. Not only do they
40:58
have the cold card Mark 4,
41:00
which is the cypherpunk calculator, but
41:02
they also now have the cold
41:04
card Q, which has the large
41:06
screen, has a full QWERTY keyboard,
41:08
has a flashlight and a QR
41:11
code scanner. It is the cypherpunk
41:13
blackberry of the cold card series. And if
41:15
you are looking to keep your Bitcoin safe
41:17
and you want all of those advanced features,
41:20
you want to do some custom setup with
41:22
multisig. You want security features for those edge
41:24
case scenarios where you need a brick me
41:26
pin or a dummy pin that opens up
41:29
to a fake wallet. The cold card has
41:31
it all. And if you
41:33
don't want to complicate your setup or you
41:35
don't need any of those advanced features, you
41:37
can use it simply as a secure default
41:40
Bitcoin signing device. Keep your seed,
41:42
keep your keys off of your
41:45
desktop computer, off of your phone
41:47
and securely and easily use your
41:49
Bitcoin. If you do not
41:51
have a cold card or you haven't even checked
41:54
it out yet, go to coinkite.com. The link will
41:56
be right in the show notes. And don't forget
41:58
that when you are at your checkout. the
42:00
code Bitcoin audible all one word will
42:02
get you a discount that will also
42:04
be right in the show notes in
42:06
case you forget about it. Keep
42:09
your keys safe and get yourself
42:11
a cold card. I am
42:14
really curious about that specifically, actually. Yeah.
42:17
Like to what degree
42:19
is because it's
42:21
one thing to see videos and everything
42:24
on Twitter and stuff and then build
42:26
like a picture of what it is
42:28
in your mind versus. Versus the
42:31
reality of it. But
42:34
it does seem like they have one of
42:36
the they have the largest and potentially most
42:38
sophisticated surveillance and control apparatus in the world.
42:40
Yeah, possibly. And
42:44
I'm curious. One of the things that you brought up is
42:47
earlier on the conversation is the
42:49
banker protests and that all
42:51
of their QR codes went red. Can
42:54
you explain a the
42:57
relationship to the larger surveillance
42:59
apparatus that they have? Yeah.
43:02
What's the consequence of the QR codes
43:04
going red? Does that
43:06
still apply? Are these systems still in
43:08
place? And how broad do you know
43:10
in your in
43:13
your knowledge, how broad are these systems?
43:15
Are they all across mainland China? Are
43:17
these just in the big cities? Is
43:20
this how normal is this system? Yeah,
43:23
I want to I want to start off
43:25
by saying like I've like thought and researched
43:27
the surveillance state a lot, but
43:30
I'm not by no means like the expert
43:32
or the definitive expert. So there's definitely a
43:34
couple of resources out there. Just
43:37
I forget exactly. God, I always
43:39
forget. But if people just look up the technical
43:41
surveillance state in China, I believe there's a book
43:43
that a Wall Street journalist or someone like
43:46
published specifically on this topic. So
43:49
that's just first off. But in terms of
43:51
like my point of view on this. Yeah.
43:55
So the Chinese Party
43:57
state, I think and that was kind of
43:59
the article you wrote. over. For me, China
44:01
is like the red team. China
44:03
is the red team. You gotta
44:05
give the Chinese party say, gotta give
44:08
them something. I forgot all those memes.
44:10
You gotta give them something. They're
44:13
pretty sophisticated. I mean, it was interesting, we
44:15
talked about Canada and one nugget I'll give
44:17
to you and your viewers is
44:19
that Canada is
44:22
probably behind, but they do have, there
44:24
was a Bitcoin conference where at least their
44:26
tax authorities seem to be very
44:28
aware of lightning and they seem to be very
44:30
aware. So it's like different parts of the government
44:32
may or may not be, but generally in the
44:35
West, I think the tax authorities actually have the
44:37
most incentive to be the
44:40
most up to date on
44:42
that. Intrusive in terms of
44:44
that. Aggressive about how they
44:46
surveil and analyze.
44:48
Yeah. Right, right. But law enforcement
44:51
kind of, and in China it's somewhat similar, like
44:53
law enforcement sometimes are just like, what is this
44:55
thing? Like now we have to enforce like
44:58
this, you know what I'm saying?
45:00
It's kind of different. Yeah. No, I've, I've run
45:02
into that a lot with people. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
45:04
So, you know, it's like sometimes in China, for
45:06
example, they're like, literally it's like the M Y
45:08
the equivalent of the NYPD trying to make a
45:10
case and it just happens to be
45:13
in their jurisdiction. Right. So, but going
45:15
back to surveillance state, the, when I was talking
45:17
about the QR codes, China has a very
45:20
expansive surveillance state. It
45:22
is a really great red team because it
45:25
seems to understand technologies very well. So it's
45:27
been adversarial against Tor. So
45:29
it seems to understand it will fake
45:31
Tor requests and actually like
45:34
shut down your attempts to connect
45:36
to Tor within China by
45:38
querying your requests and seeing if
45:40
it comes back to a known
45:42
Tor relay. So
45:44
there's been like a lot of literature on this.
45:46
On Noster, I talked to Will from Domus about
45:48
this, right? Not only did they take down the
45:50
app, but they actually banned the
45:53
default relays that the
45:55
app had from VPN access. Cause the
45:57
relays are still like IP addresses, right?
46:00
So they were able to ban that. So
46:02
they seem to understand relays. They
46:05
seem to understand that the technology is built, and they
46:07
were really quick about that. Will told
46:09
me it was two days. Two days they
46:12
took down the app. That's
46:16
really surprising because Domus is you would think
46:18
not a huge deal. But within two days,
46:20
the app was taken down, and then within
46:22
a few days I think after that, they
46:24
were already attacking the default relays. So they
46:27
have a very
46:29
sophisticated and quick understanding of how
46:31
these technologies emerge. I'm
46:37
not sure, and this is why I refer to
46:39
the book, because I think it's an open point
46:41
of contention. It's like a
46:43
black box. Nobody really truly
46:45
knows how unified everything is.
46:48
There's a lot of data being collected.
46:52
But whether or not a department has access
46:54
to it, or agency has access to it.
46:56
How actionable is it? How many layers of
47:00
authority and insight do
47:02
certain institutions have? Exactly. But in China,
47:05
there's many layers of surveillance. And
47:07
we'll start with the first, which is
47:09
the bank protest stuff. They have a
47:11
lot of physical surveillance. They have
47:13
a lot of physical surveillance, a lot
47:16
of facial recognition. And
47:19
so if you're physically
47:21
protesting, it's
47:23
very dangerous. Because they have
47:25
cameras everywhere. They have cameras
47:28
everywhere. Have you ever been in China? One
47:30
of the oddest things is
47:33
just the number of cameras. It's like, even
47:35
like, I've heard the UK is also very
47:37
CCTV'd up. But if
47:40
you've been to China, one of the cities, I
47:44
remember walking through Tiananmen Square. I'm
47:46
just like, there is more cameras than people
47:48
at some points. Just absurd
47:50
how many cameras there are. And all
47:52
those cameras are backed up with facial
47:54
recognition. And then all the facial recognition
47:57
is tied to your state
47:59
IDs. So, you know,
48:01
people in China are very credentialed in that way. And
48:04
then that surveillance also extends
48:06
to your virtual activities. So
48:11
unlike, I think in the West there
48:13
are versions of this and you're starting to see some of this,
48:15
right? Like one of the things I want
48:17
to bring up in this conversation is like it's very easy
48:19
to be like China's super dystopian in many
48:21
ways. So that can't happen here. But
48:24
there are versions of it happening here. Or
48:26
in the West, for large, or whatever. So
48:28
for example, in the UK, you started seeing
48:30
that where people posted stuff and
48:32
then they got, you know, knocks on the door from the
48:35
police and things like that. There's people who have, you
48:37
know, posted things in the United States and they get knocked
48:39
on the door. So there is some
48:41
of that. But in China, I think the difference
48:43
is like it's pretty, it's more systematic. It's definitely
48:45
more systematic and they will
48:48
arrest people for much less. So
48:51
they've arrested people for like tweeting glory
48:54
to Hong Kong with like 40 Twitter
48:56
followers. Right? Good
48:58
God. Yeah. I
49:01
think the Chinese thing, the security state, why
49:03
it's a little bit scary to deal with, it's like
49:05
it's super random. Like they seem to
49:08
arrest people for very small things, almost as like a
49:10
reminder that they could. Yeah. You
49:13
know. And so back in the day in 2021,
49:15
I headed up this thing called the, you know,
49:17
I was on Clubhouse. I don't know if you
49:19
were on Clubhouse. Yeah, I was on Clubhouse for
49:22
a little while. Oh, cool, cool, cool.
49:24
Yeah. So I had the largest
49:26
like English language. We also did like the Mandarin
49:28
learners room, but we also had
49:30
this room called Tianxia, which is kind of like the
49:32
largest English language room in China. And
49:35
so we had discussions with people and yeah, people
49:37
said that they were called in to talk with
49:39
the cops. It's like chita.
49:43
So the local police enforcement, like, you
49:45
know, they are forwarded. Like if you have
49:47
online behavior, the state doesn't like, they
49:50
are forwarded that information. They can reach out to people.
49:53
So the surveillance state is very
49:55
sophisticated. It seems to collect a lot of
49:57
data and to some degree online activity. is
50:00
paired with offline law enforcement. And
50:04
another article I wrote pretty recently is like,
50:08
how they've
50:10
arrested people for quote-unquote trading virtual
50:12
currencies. And they seem to be moving
50:15
to this definition of like, Bitcoin
50:19
or digital assets are like
50:21
money laundering or have more implications of money laundering
50:24
if you're trying to trade with it. And
50:28
so when you look at
50:30
the arrests, like they do work with
50:32
like the, these are like local police
50:34
departments and they work with like exchanges
50:36
that have left China, I'm assuming like
50:38
whoa B Binance, OKX or whatever. But
50:41
they also work with like, there's
50:44
a chain analysis equivalent in China,
50:47
which was like created by a lot of the
50:49
like initial investors in crypto and stuff like that.
50:52
So I think there's like a very delicate balance because
50:55
one of the things that is kind of interesting to
50:57
think about, I wasn't able to write about this in
50:59
the book as much because I think it's very personal.
51:01
But some people in the
51:04
Bitcoin scene, in crypto scene have left
51:06
China, but some people have
51:08
not and still live in China.
51:11
And so the question is like, why
51:14
is that? Yeah, it seems like a
51:16
big risk if considering how they're potentially
51:18
treating it. What happened
51:20
with Telegram, right? It's like the guy got arrested
51:22
and all of a sudden Telegram changes policy. So
51:24
we do know that the Chinese police cooperates with
51:27
different exchanges
51:29
that have left, OTC desks, even
51:32
though those are technically illegal in order
51:35
to trace like on-chain payments and things like
51:37
that. I don't know, again, I don't
51:39
know how sophisticated they are with Lightning. I haven't really
51:41
seen that come up. But for
51:43
like trading on Tether, for
51:45
trading on Bitcoin, on
51:47
Mainnet, they seem to be
51:49
on-chain. They seem to be pretty
51:52
on top of that. So like most people use exchanges
51:54
or a lot of people use exchanges. So that's
51:56
kind of like another thing. Yeah,
51:59
the on-ramps. and off-ramps are
52:01
always like the tag back,
52:04
like the biggest obvious
52:06
hole in everybody's security
52:08
setup. Yeah. And the Chinese
52:11
government has worked, so I mentioned this plus token thing,
52:13
right? So at one point, the Chinese government seized all
52:15
the Bitcoin, which I think is like 190K Bitcoin, but
52:18
they've apparently slowly sold it. So they
52:20
are working with the OTC desks or
52:22
some OTC desks are working with them,
52:24
right? And so, assuming there's some cooperation
52:26
there. So all this to say, there's
52:28
a big surveillance state, so it's very
52:30
easy to track offline to online
52:33
movement. And so, if
52:35
you're protesting offline, that will
52:37
have consequences. If you're protesting online, that can
52:39
be tied to your real identity. When
52:41
we talk about the digital Yuan and
52:43
all this other stuff, that's just another
52:45
layer of data, another air layer of
52:47
reinforcement on top of that. I think
52:49
the open question about China, because there's
52:51
definitely a lot of people who suffer
52:53
consequences, there definitely seem to be some
52:55
kind of scoring system. But the question
52:57
is more whether or not
53:00
that's as comprehensive, that they have
53:02
a one number fits all kind
53:04
of approach on people, right? Versus
53:06
it being a little bit more ad hoc. At least
53:08
for the Bitcoin stuff, I've seen it be a little
53:10
bit more ad hoc. Because the
53:12
arrests that they have are a little bit random. For
53:14
example, I don't think the
53:17
local police department is aware
53:20
of all the people who are trading
53:22
Bitcoin. There's also 89 nodes or something
53:24
that are run in China. That's not
53:27
illegal per se. But my point is,
53:30
even the way they enforce the VPN
53:32
ban, because VPNs are banned in China,
53:34
they can't really find individual users. There's
53:36
a crazy amount of people in China
53:38
who use VPNs. So, it's
53:41
kind of this thing where it's technically
53:43
against the law in certain
53:45
respects. But the local police department,
53:49
they're busy enforcing whatever other crimes.
53:52
They're not necessarily systematic looking at
53:54
it. Enforceability at scale is really
53:56
difficult. And this
53:58
is true of a lot of... like
54:01
over complicated and over invasive laws is
54:03
what ends up happening is that just
54:06
the sheer lack of resources and
54:09
time to do so
54:11
is you just pick and
54:13
you make examples of people and you
54:15
try to scare everyone into following the
54:18
law because it is
54:20
truly unenforceable at scale
54:22
like you might end up just with more people
54:24
than you could possibly have prison space you know
54:26
I mean it just yeah
54:28
so it's it's a really interesting
54:30
and odd thing and it
54:33
makes sense that it would result in just bizarre
54:36
one-off arrests just just to make sure that
54:38
everybody in your social circle knows you could
54:40
still just be arrested for this yeah
54:43
no they do that they make examples that's actually
54:45
how chinese censorship works people have this idea that
54:47
it's like oh i instantly say a bad word
54:49
and a band that's not
54:51
how it works really the chinese
54:53
government like sets standards and
54:56
like makes it very clear to the companies we
54:58
want you to ban these these these these types
55:00
of people and then the rest
55:02
will kind of follow you know so
55:05
it's kind of like censorship by self-censorship
55:09
setting standards so
55:11
that people are afraid and people
55:14
chinese people are genuinely afraid and i think this is
55:16
part of some chinese people i think some of this
55:18
part of the reason why there's there is this like
55:21
sensitivity to digital privacy against
55:24
surveillance tech because i've seen people overseas
55:26
who refuse to talk about their views
55:28
on shijipi i'm talking about
55:30
like people in the united states yeah
55:32
they will like guard their devices and
55:34
stuff like that or they will not
55:36
talk about it so i think
55:38
it's just like this awareness of the surveillance state
55:40
is just kind of out there but yeah to
55:42
the enforceability point like it's just also i mean
55:44
i think in the west also that's also gonna
55:46
struggle um but in china like it's
55:49
just like not very enforceable and one of the points
55:51
i was gonna bring up because you asked about the
55:53
bitcoin mining is like there are
55:55
people i've had screenshots of people who are
55:57
selling acic miners openly in cinzen right
56:00
It seems like there are some local deal. I mean,
56:02
Daniel Baden had that report. I haven't been able to
56:05
get this specifically, but he had two or
56:07
three sources that refused to be named, of
56:09
course, because what they're doing is kind of
56:11
illegal. But they
56:13
were saying they still mind with
56:15
the cooperation local. So the thing
56:18
is the local governments control the
56:20
police departments. And
56:23
so whether or not
56:26
you enforce is
56:29
dependent on the local police departments. And the
56:31
local readers have a lot of sway in
56:33
that. So I do believe still a lot
56:35
of breaking up of the decision
56:38
making of the on the ground decision
56:40
making just because it's not, yeah,
56:43
that's that's interesting dynamic.
56:46
So there's local mining, I think that's happening
56:48
because you can talk with the police department
56:50
ultimately is what will matter when it comes
56:52
to enforcement of that, because they'll
56:54
be the ones who will be like, hey, there's
56:56
like a huge electricity spike or something, right? But
56:58
if the local, if you have
57:00
ends with the local governments, I think that's
57:02
like where you can do under the table.
57:04
They can't do it publicly, because the highest
57:08
level of Chinese government that's commenting the issue has
57:10
basically said that quit mining is bad. Yeah.
57:13
Yeah. So that's kind of like where
57:15
I think like the dynamic of the
57:17
laws seems like that would end
57:19
up creating a lot of like
57:21
small mafia sort of situations
57:23
where the local
57:25
government can basically exert whatever control
57:28
or punishment it wants, because again,
57:31
basically, everyone's breaking the law. So make sure
57:33
you give us that 30%
57:35
you owe us of this of this thing
57:37
that everybody knows is against
57:41
the law, but we're just going to let it happen. At
57:43
least historically, and in a lot of situations,
57:46
it puts people who are lower in the
57:48
totem pole with
57:50
far more power and ends up
57:52
creating a bizarre
57:54
kind of decentralization of violent
58:00
political control, you know,
58:02
like it's it's it's odd how it
58:04
how it actually splits up the the
58:06
economics of violence into localities
58:09
that yeah being little
58:11
fiefdoms that Basically
58:13
just use the fact that they
58:16
know that the government above them
58:18
can come in and destroy
58:20
this or Attack you
58:22
that they have the excuse to just
58:24
basically wipe you out at any point and they
58:26
basically capitalize on that as much as they can
58:29
Yeah Do you know if
58:31
that's true of the situation over there or
58:34
do you suspect or not have
58:36
any info in that regard? I
58:39
don't have like not specifically for Bitcoin related
58:41
stuff, but in general that is how China
58:43
works so there's
58:45
a really famous case of Bo
58:48
Shilai who was kind of the party
58:50
boss of the Chongqing City, which is
58:52
a very large city in China and
58:55
he actually his Wife
58:59
was suspected of murdering someone
59:03
Well his police chief. This is
59:05
kind of like what happened was this police chief had
59:08
to leave and tried to seek asylum in
59:12
The this is the chief of police like try
59:14
to see asylum on the US Embassy and Then
59:17
when that happened the the central government
59:19
was like, okay, we have to so
59:23
It used to be the case at the central
59:25
government before Xi Jinping the leader before that for
59:27
lack of a better word was like weaker not
59:30
as respected Was
59:32
not like so there was a lot more like
59:34
local kind of fiefdoms you can say She's
59:36
meaning has done a lot of things. He
59:39
has become an unprecedented Leader
59:42
since the shopping by
59:44
you know now he's gonna renew into another
59:46
term. That's never happened before It's been 10
59:49
years 10 years, right? Now
59:52
he seems to be like the paramount leader for
59:54
like longer and one of the things he's been
59:56
doing is this quote quote-unquote anti-corruption
59:58
drive and they want to arrest
1:00:01
what they call tigers and flies. And
1:00:03
so Bo Xilai and his mentor, who was
1:00:06
also kind of on the Politburo Standing
1:00:08
Committee. So there's like this, the Politburo rules
1:00:10
China, it's like 25 men, it's almost always
1:00:12
men. And then there's the
1:00:14
Politburo Standing Committee, which is even more powerful. I forget
1:00:16
the exact number of people sit on that. But the
1:00:18
point is like the
1:00:21
most powerful people in China. And previously,
1:00:23
there had never been any member of
1:00:25
that who had gone to jail since
1:00:28
Mao. There had never been.
1:00:30
And then Xi Jinping actually jailed, starting with
1:00:32
Bo Xilai. But
1:00:34
although that was happening under the previous leader
1:00:36
as well. But then they started arresting people
1:00:38
at more senior ranks than have ever been
1:00:40
arrested. And they've started going
1:00:43
after. Yeah, so this is
1:00:45
kind of the central, the party realizes it,
1:00:47
right? They realize like if corruption, you
1:00:49
know, there used to be all these sites on China
1:00:51
in Chinese internet, like one of the funniest things was
1:00:54
like, you have these local government officials, right? It's like
1:00:56
their public salaries are like nothing. But they're watching, they're
1:00:58
wearing all these Rolexes. There's all these like photos of
1:01:00
them wearing like the fanciest watches, right? And
1:01:03
so the party knows and Xi has always
1:01:05
said, like, I covered in the book,
1:01:08
a little bit would help my whole Bitcoin a little
1:01:10
bit. Like basically, the party is
1:01:13
very concerned about corruption. And that
1:01:15
bleeds into kind of
1:01:17
the way they think about overseas
1:01:20
money. They've actually like co-opted people to try
1:01:22
to bring them back to China, claiming
1:01:24
that they're corrupt or that they've gained their money
1:01:26
through corruption. But it is kind
1:01:28
of like what you've observed. They are kind
1:01:30
of like local fiefdoms, if that makes sense.
1:01:32
But now, the central government has been stronger
1:01:35
than ever. But China,
1:01:38
see, the thing is the local
1:01:40
governments, they raise tax revenue. It's
1:01:42
the most important thing for them. Yeah.
1:01:45
And because they
1:01:47
raise taxes mostly through real
1:01:49
estate value, property tax,
1:01:53
but real estate value has been going down in China.
1:01:55
And so now, the central
1:02:00
governments were struggling. And so the
1:02:02
local governments, to give you
1:02:04
more of a Bitcoin mining example, they
1:02:06
probably really pissed that Bitcoin miners left.
1:02:08
Because think about it, you have all
1:02:11
these stranded resources. And
1:02:13
the central government's like, oh, we're gonna
1:02:15
bring in HPC, we're gonna bring in
1:02:17
AI and stuff like that. But
1:02:21
first of all, it might not be a fit for
1:02:24
their stranded power. There
1:02:26
might be curtailment issues, or
1:02:28
they might need much
1:02:31
larger data center, like water needs or
1:02:33
whatever, right? Then that region is currently,
1:02:35
I'm thinking about Xinjiang, for
1:02:37
example. And- It's
1:02:41
not the same degree of granularity
1:02:43
in the setup that you can
1:02:46
do with Bitcoin. It's kind of
1:02:48
wild how variable
1:02:51
any excess capital or any excess energy
1:02:53
that you can just gobble up. You
1:02:57
know? Exactly. And so yeah, if
1:02:59
you're like a local Chinese government,
1:03:01
you're given the other
1:03:05
task you're given is poverty elevation. You
1:03:07
have to raise local taxes in order to spend it
1:03:09
to help people rise out of poverty. That's also your
1:03:11
number one goal. But then the central
1:03:14
government just like kneecapped you. It
1:03:16
just literally is just like, here's the source
1:03:19
of income. And they're businesses
1:03:21
that were just taking the stranded power. So
1:03:23
that's why I do suspect there are
1:03:26
some local government deals. And
1:03:28
because of these like fiefdoms that you're talking
1:03:30
about, they're happening under the table, it's definitely
1:03:32
like probably some amount of risk the
1:03:35
central government finds out. But also,
1:03:38
China is so fast. There's so
1:03:40
many things happening. And also,
1:03:44
that's also another thing that confuses a lot of people
1:03:46
and still confuses me, even though I guess I wrote
1:03:48
a book on the topic. It's like, is Bitcoin banned
1:03:50
in China? Is Bitcoin not banned? It's like, so
1:03:54
holding Bitcoin isn't really. Well,
1:03:57
yes, it's banned. But like, you know, what
1:03:59
does that mean? Right? Like, they haven't gone
1:04:01
after people who hold Bitcoin. They haven't really
1:04:03
gone after like, you know what I'm saying?
1:04:05
Like, there probably could be something like Venezuela,
1:04:07
where like, to my point, like, if the
1:04:10
national government was like, we're gonna just look
1:04:12
at power usage, consumption
1:04:14
habits, you know, we're
1:04:17
gonna take down every Bitcoin full node
1:04:19
that has a Chinese plaintext IP address,
1:04:21
we're gonna like ban, you know, Bitcoin
1:04:23
protocol related, you know what I'm saying?
1:04:26
Like, they're, they could be taking more
1:04:28
steps, if that makes sense. Yeah. But
1:04:30
the courts have ruled that Bitcoin is
1:04:32
property. But they've also made it
1:04:34
like really difficult to like, buy
1:04:37
or sell Bitcoin. And
1:04:39
so the idea is like, you know,
1:04:41
you can't use it as currency, it's kind of
1:04:43
like property. So I think that's kind of like
1:04:45
a compromise, because a lot of people in China
1:04:48
made money through, you
1:04:50
know, Bitcoin, right? And so I don't
1:04:53
think the Chinese government necessarily frowns
1:04:55
upon that. Because the idea is like, that's kind
1:04:57
of like, almost like a form of fdi. If
1:04:59
you think about it, this
1:05:01
is the swan Bitcoin app. And this is how easy it
1:05:04
is to just buy Bitcoin whenever you're feeling like it. And
1:05:06
I feel like it right now. And as it shows me
1:05:08
right here, I still have $9,388 worth of my $10,000 of
1:05:10
Bitcoin buying that has no fees whatsoever. And now I have
1:05:12
$10 more worth
1:05:20
of Bitcoin. I do
1:05:22
this quite often. One of
1:05:24
the really great things about swan
1:05:26
is the incredible number of resources
1:05:28
they have for learning and understanding
1:05:30
anything that you want to know
1:05:33
about Bitcoin. And
1:05:35
importantly, they're going to teach you why
1:05:37
you should not trade, they're not going
1:05:39
to encourage you to trade, they are
1:05:41
Bitcoin only, if you're looking for an
1:05:43
easy and reliable way to get into
1:05:45
Bitcoin, if you're looking to put Bitcoin
1:05:48
in your IRA, if you're looking to
1:05:50
put Bitcoin in your business, if you're
1:05:52
looking to do anything around getting on
1:05:54
a Bitcoin standard or getting exposed to
1:05:56
Bitcoin in your portfolio, check out swan
1:05:58
bitcoin.com/guy is my special. link and you
1:06:00
will find it very conveniently right in
1:06:02
the show notes. There's
1:06:04
an interesting dynamic. This
1:06:07
is one of the things about game theory is that
1:06:11
there are benefits and drawbacks to power
1:06:13
for Bitcoin. There
1:06:15
are so many different facets
1:06:17
and elements that why
1:06:20
I say yes, they've banned it and yes,
1:06:22
it's free to use is
1:06:25
they want to have their cake and
1:06:27
eat it too, which is the ultimate
1:06:30
benefit of every state apparatus. How
1:06:33
do we get its benefit without
1:06:35
banning or without allowing what
1:06:37
it does to hurt us, especially
1:06:40
in the context of capital controls. Xi
1:06:42
Jinping is very explicit
1:06:45
and very like hammer
1:06:47
down about capital controls, allowing
1:06:49
anything even if
1:06:52
it benefits them for the capital that
1:06:54
they get the potential threat for allowing
1:06:57
capital to free float out easily could
1:07:00
be a huge problem. It's this
1:07:02
weird balancing act where we're
1:07:04
not going to completely ban it and
1:07:06
where it's helping us, we're just going to
1:07:08
turn the other cheek and not worry about
1:07:11
it. It's
1:07:13
that thing, we're just going to selectively
1:07:15
punish where it becomes the law itself
1:07:17
mostly becomes meaningless and we're just going
1:07:19
to selectively punish what hurts us and
1:07:21
turn the other way if it's helping
1:07:24
us. Yeah,
1:07:26
and I mean, some people have, I
1:07:29
was actually going to try to write an
1:07:31
op-ed, but there was a Hong Kong professor
1:07:33
who wrote an op-ed that said like, hey,
1:07:35
the Bitcoin mining ban was such a terrible
1:07:37
decision by the Chinese government because all the
1:07:39
tax revenue flew to the United States. In
1:07:44
the op-ed, they argued like, if you want
1:07:46
it to be under government control, just have
1:07:48
it mined by state-owned enterprises. Yeah,
1:07:54
but yeah, he was like, there's a terrible mistake.
1:07:56
And I gave a talk at the Bitcoin Policy
1:07:58
Institute. I kind of made the reverse. point
1:08:00
because there was like American legislators in
1:08:03
the audience and I was
1:08:05
like, hey, like this is
1:08:07
the first thing China has given back. This
1:08:10
is a gift to the United States. Yeah.
1:08:12
Like China has spent so
1:08:15
much like, you know, developing, if
1:08:17
you think about it, like all the expertise
1:08:19
for like creating these chips, managing
1:08:22
chips at scale and stuff like that,
1:08:25
China is just like totally seized. Like
1:08:27
there's state guidance funds that like fund
1:08:30
all these things. You
1:08:32
know, the manufacturing element, like the whole story
1:08:34
of the world economy is how like the
1:08:36
United States has basically not
1:08:38
become a manufacturing superpower anymore
1:08:42
and is now kind of like
1:08:44
more of an energy superpower,
1:08:47
which is also kind of interesting as
1:08:49
a dynamic, but then also like a
1:08:52
services superpower, right? But if you want
1:08:54
to get like anything manufactured, that's why all the Bitcoin mining,
1:08:56
the A6, the first generation, it all came out of China,
1:08:59
right? Because they already had all the expertise for
1:09:01
like creating custom chips. Yeah,
1:09:03
they already had that. And
1:09:06
so I think by like, first
1:09:09
of all, there's like the direct benefits of like all the
1:09:11
local tax revenue, like whatever, like that's fine. But
1:09:15
also, there's the skills transfer.
1:09:18
There's like, I mean, it's like gonna be a
1:09:20
critical skill, I think not just for Bitcoin,
1:09:24
but also for like HPC, right? For
1:09:26
like anything to have like the electricians,
1:09:28
right? To have the people who understand
1:09:30
like, how do you manage the compute
1:09:33
to have people, you know, scale that up.
1:09:37
And so the fact that China just basically like
1:09:40
exported a bunch of its talent
1:09:43
that had set up all these things, right?
1:09:45
And then also just like, totally
1:09:47
isn't using its stranded energy resources. So
1:09:50
that's like totally going to waste. Like,
1:09:53
that gives other countries, I mean, noticeably the United
1:09:55
States because the US ended up gaining the most
1:09:57
from the Bitcoin mining man, essentially.
1:10:01
It went to all the pubcos. And
1:10:05
it's funny because I wrote this article before
1:10:07
the Bitcoin mining ban happened. But
1:10:10
you remember how Ripple CEO, like Brad or
1:10:12
whatever, was always like, oh, Bitcoin is under
1:10:14
the control of China. Yeah. Oh, yeah. Because
1:10:16
all their mining. Huge fudge, yeah. Yeah,
1:10:20
like huge fudge. And it just made no sense because it's like,
1:10:22
oh, yeah, the mining pools are Chinese. The miners are in China.
1:10:24
It doesn't mean like they're mining on behest of
1:10:27
the Chinese government. As we learned
1:10:29
because they were kicked out and
1:10:31
then they left like, you know, everywhere.
1:10:34
So it really was like a huge
1:10:37
strategic blunder. Like when you when
1:10:39
you really like think about it because
1:10:42
they had such a position,
1:10:45
it was a failure to recognize what
1:10:47
a freaking asset a strong
1:10:50
position in Bitcoin would have been. And
1:10:52
I think it was a short
1:10:55
term. How do we deal with control? Again,
1:10:57
going back to the whole positive
1:10:59
negative game theory thing, is it like how
1:11:02
do you balance how it's going to
1:11:04
help us because it undermines us at the exact same time? Yeah,
1:11:07
it's great. Yeah, they're trying to take
1:11:09
both. But yeah, one thing that's also
1:11:11
happening now is I know you've talked
1:11:13
about Trump babbling a bit. And
1:11:17
you know, I have my own opinions about Trump and I was there in
1:11:19
Nashville as well when he gave his talk. And I'm just like, this is
1:11:21
you know, this is its own thing.
1:11:24
I got to be a little bit more
1:11:26
moderated because I'm technically part of the team
1:11:28
because I published a book through Bitcoin mag.
1:11:30
But like, but like, suffice it to say,
1:11:32
I'm not like really a big fan of
1:11:35
like Trump's ability to be coherent
1:11:37
at any given moment. But
1:11:39
you know, the funny thing about that
1:11:41
is like there's this like, there's like
1:11:44
maybe like a thousand or ten thousand
1:11:46
people in China state apparatus are like
1:11:48
assigned to literally study everything he does.
1:11:51
Oh, my God, you're serious. No,
1:11:53
no, no, it's like their number one priority. It's like their
1:11:55
number one priority is to understand what the US president will
1:11:57
do. Right. And there's like that one. of
1:11:59
a chance for the US for the... I
1:12:01
remember there's this guy, Bill Bishop, and I
1:12:04
recommend for anybody who's more interested in China.
1:12:06
He's got like the Sinusism newsletter. It's like
1:12:08
a great resource. He like really, quote unquote,
1:12:10
the China watching. He's probably like the guy,
1:12:12
spent a lot of time in Beijing. Actually
1:12:14
used to be a market watch. Hopefully I'm
1:12:16
not outing him, but he's told me that
1:12:18
he is a Bitcoiner, which is kind of
1:12:20
cool. But we're trying to get him
1:12:22
to come out to some Bitcoin events and maybe like do
1:12:24
a panel together, but we'll see. See
1:12:27
about that. So he
1:12:31
has written
1:12:33
a lot about like kind of
1:12:35
China and Bitcoin. Sorry, I lost my train
1:12:37
of thought. Guy, you're gonna have to help
1:12:39
me. No worries. No worries. So I actually
1:12:41
want to go back to something
1:12:44
that you said kind of towards the
1:12:47
beginning for the
1:12:50
second section when we started talking about capital controls and
1:12:52
stuff, because the
1:12:54
Yuan or the UN, they
1:13:00
have a very interesting currency system. Yeah.
1:13:03
Because there's an internal
1:13:05
currency and there's an
1:13:07
external currency. And as
1:13:10
I understand it, they basically have a CBDC
1:13:12
now. And I'm
1:13:15
curious, actually,
1:13:17
can you give me a break? Like what
1:13:19
degree do you know about how that whole
1:13:21
system works and the
1:13:23
decision making behind that? Like why it works
1:13:25
that way? Because obviously Bitcoin
1:13:28
very much fits into how
1:13:30
well do the, like for
1:13:32
an internal and external currency, it seems like
1:13:36
you'd have to be pretty sophisticated. You actually
1:13:38
have to understand that there are international
1:13:41
dynamics for a currency that are different than
1:13:43
the internal, the domestic dynamics,
1:13:46
which is basically the huge problem that
1:13:48
the US has with the inability
1:13:51
to not run deficits. Like we
1:13:53
have to because we're a global
1:13:56
currency. So maybe
1:13:58
talk to that. The
1:14:00
degree to which China seems to kind of
1:14:03
get that having a world
1:14:05
reserve currency might not be a good idea
1:14:07
almost. But
1:14:09
I don't know, it seems odd. It
1:14:12
seems odd because it plays different than what
1:14:14
most governments I feel like think about in
1:14:17
the terms of their currency. Okay.
1:14:20
Yeah, no, this is something I covered in the
1:14:22
fifth chapter of my book. Okay, cool. I've
1:14:25
spent a lot of time thinking about. And
1:14:27
it is quite complex, but I'll try to drive us
1:14:29
to two or three takeaways here. So
1:14:32
the first is that the
1:14:35
Yuan is
1:14:37
the Yuan is the Yuan, the ECNY is a version
1:14:39
of the Yuan. There isn't like
1:14:41
an external or internal necessarily. Having
1:14:45
said that, yeah, so the Yuan, the
1:14:47
way it's stage managed now is it
1:14:49
floats against the US dollar in a
1:14:52
semi-trading range. And China's central
1:14:54
bank determines that. They
1:14:58
have an interest towards
1:15:00
making it slightly weaker because that makes
1:15:02
Chinese exports more competitive. But
1:15:05
at the same time, they can't make it too weak
1:15:07
because then Xi Jinping will get
1:15:10
mad because he wants a stronger Yuan. And
1:15:13
then there's like always a balance, right? Because
1:15:15
then they don't have the
1:15:17
imports. So I
1:15:19
do think China is trying to
1:15:21
make itself more of a global
1:15:23
reserve currency. It's doing that through-
1:15:26
Interesting, okay. Yeah, it's doing that
1:15:28
through like multilateral institutions. So one
1:15:30
in particular, so you mentioned
1:15:32
capital controls. And I think one really interesting
1:15:34
thing about that is that China is actually
1:15:36
loosening some capital controls. It's
1:15:39
allowing foreigners to withdraw money if they're
1:15:42
in the Shanghai free trade zone and stuff like that. Because
1:15:45
China is struggling a lot with getting
1:15:47
foreign direct investment into the country now.
1:15:50
The economic growth is slowing. There's
1:15:53
a lot of political stuff. What happened with Hong
1:15:55
Kong rightfully so, I think unsettled
1:15:57
a lot of people. So
1:16:00
now with China
1:16:04
kind of trying
1:16:06
to get more liberalization,
1:16:08
they want to have their cake and eat it
1:16:10
too. Because I think the idea, I was reading
1:16:13
this book called Cashless, which
1:16:15
is written by kind of like my flip
1:16:17
side. So I wrote a book about how
1:16:19
I think Bitcoin will change
1:16:22
China to a
1:16:24
certain degree. And this
1:16:26
guy, Richard something, wrote a book
1:16:28
called Cashless, where he thinks that all
1:16:31
Bitcoin is going to be BS, all
1:16:33
cryptos BS. And
1:16:35
that the digital yuan and the Chinese payment standard is
1:16:37
going to be the standard of the whole world will
1:16:40
embrace. And
1:16:43
one of the interesting points, one of the things he did say that
1:16:45
was kind of interesting though, was that he mentioned
1:16:48
it as a trade off, which I didn't really
1:16:50
think about, which is like if you have a
1:16:52
more controllable programmable digital money,
1:16:54
and that's directly under control of
1:16:56
the government, you don't actually need capital
1:16:58
controls. Or
1:17:01
you don't need capital controls in the
1:17:03
sense of it
1:17:05
can be more granular, it can be more programmable. You
1:17:08
don't have to set like a blunt limit of like you
1:17:10
only get can exit 50,000. You can look at different
1:17:13
regions, you can see if people are
1:17:15
preparing their funds to exit, you can
1:17:17
do all these things. And you can
1:17:20
individually assign this hypothetical example. I don't
1:17:22
think this will happen because right now
1:17:24
the Chinese Central Bank doesn't want it
1:17:26
to be interest rate bearing.
1:17:28
So they don't want it to, they want it to
1:17:30
just be like cash, the easy and why. But
1:17:32
in theory, they could make it
1:17:34
so that if they thought someone's trying to exit the
1:17:36
country, they could try to like restrict
1:17:38
that. Or they could like reward you
1:17:40
for keeping the money in the country or in the
1:17:42
easy life form by giving
1:17:44
you like interest rate. Or they could, they've
1:17:47
done in pilots, they could make your money expire.
1:17:49
So you could like, you'd have to spend it
1:17:51
within a certain time. The
1:17:54
ECNY, the digital yen is still
1:17:57
a representation of the yen. Now,
1:18:00
where I think people get confused a
1:18:02
little bit when it comes to Chinese payment ecosystems
1:18:05
is that there is a lot of
1:18:07
digital payment versus cash. And
1:18:10
so most people when they pay, they basically
1:18:12
pay with like WeChat Pay or AliPay, which are
1:18:14
these two apps that are connected to kind of
1:18:16
like your WeChat or Alibaba.
1:18:20
And so these ecosystems are
1:18:23
really the main way people in China pay.
1:18:26
They're just like online apps. They're connected to
1:18:28
your bank account in China. So
1:18:31
in that way, it kind of flows as like Yuan,
1:18:33
but that's like kind of the main default payment experience
1:18:35
for most people. The ECNY is
1:18:38
trying to do two things. One
1:18:41
is like domestically, it's
1:18:43
trying to be like a more viable option. I don't know
1:18:45
how successful they will be with this because WeChat Pay
1:18:47
and AliPay have a lot of like network effects. So
1:18:50
for example, like they have like 10X
1:18:52
the merchant adoption the last time I checked. So
1:18:56
the Chinese government is able to undo.
1:18:59
Yeah, yeah, yeah. And actually
1:19:01
one thing that's interesting about WeChat Pay and AliPay as well
1:19:03
is they've actually transacted externally. So I
1:19:06
think that might be what you were referring to
1:19:08
with external because there are a
1:19:10
lot of places including Canada, the United States
1:19:12
and in Europe where AliPay and
1:19:14
WeChat Pay are accepted. So you
1:19:16
can transact through like Chinese bank accounts and Chinese
1:19:18
Yuan through that there are merchants
1:19:21
that accept payments through. But
1:19:25
within China, there's like competition and I think
1:19:27
like WeChat Pay, AliPay are probably going to
1:19:29
win. But China's government is trying really
1:19:31
hard. They made it so that the ECNY has 0%
1:19:34
merchant transaction fee. They
1:19:37
made it so that you
1:19:39
know, the ECNY actually
1:19:42
is like essentially
1:19:44
free to use. And
1:19:46
then also they've like positioned it. So
1:19:49
they forced, I mean, forced a strong word,
1:19:51
but they basically made like the big aggregators
1:19:54
take on like ECNY as a payment
1:19:56
option, including WeChat and Ali. So you
1:19:59
can use ECNY. through these kind
1:20:01
of places as well.
1:20:04
But I think they're gonna struggle is like there isn't
1:20:06
like a lot of like merchants that,
1:20:08
because a lot of the long tail of like
1:20:10
WeChat pay and Alipay, it's
1:20:12
like people who are like
1:20:15
merchants who are literally like have a
1:20:17
WeChat account and they have a QR
1:20:19
code and you just send it to them directly. So it's
1:20:22
not like they're using, you know what I'm saying? So
1:20:24
yeah, that's where they're not taking the ECNY because they
1:20:26
don't have an ECNY merchant account and they're not like
1:20:28
taking it on that way. So
1:20:31
that's where China's I think they're struggling
1:20:33
with like some of the ECNY adoption
1:20:35
there. I had
1:20:37
this event in New York City of Pupkey and
1:20:39
Elizabeth Stark was there. She asked a ton of
1:20:42
questions about this. So I'm
1:20:44
hopeful that someone is
1:20:46
thinking about lightning stuff. But of course, like it's
1:20:48
kind of illegal in China, but that
1:20:51
would be my hope for a lot of those merchants. Anyways,
1:20:54
the one takeaway would take from this is that
1:20:56
there is one yuan. The
1:20:58
ECNY is an
1:21:00
offering in a digital payments ecosystem
1:21:03
where China is also the most
1:21:05
cashless society. Because of
1:21:07
that, there is a lot of ability to
1:21:09
surveil digital payments. And most
1:21:12
people pay digitally by default with companies
1:21:14
that are controlled by the Chinese, well,
1:21:16
that are controlled by elites close to
1:21:18
the Chinese state. And I think that
1:21:21
the People's Bank of China would prefer
1:21:23
that it go through the government currency.
1:21:25
And they built this explicitly as kind
1:21:27
of a response to Bitcoin and Libra.
1:21:30
They accelerated it during Libra, but they
1:21:32
started researching it in 2014 right after
1:21:35
the Bitcoin regulations on how
1:21:37
to forbid Bitcoin from being in
1:21:39
Chinese banks. So the last
1:21:41
thing I'll say about this whole
1:21:43
complex system is international. You mentioned the World Reserve
1:21:45
currency. Bit. So
1:21:48
I started writing about this since 2019. And
1:21:50
I do think one
1:21:52
takeaway from this, I'll expand on this, is that
1:21:54
China is trying to become more of a World
1:21:57
Reserve currency. And the way it's doing it is...
1:22:00
trying to set standards for CBDCs.
1:22:03
This is actually like a very underappreciated
1:22:05
point, but they're working through
1:22:07
the Bank of International Settlements, which is kind
1:22:09
of the central bank for central banks. And
1:22:12
they are trying to pilot because out of
1:22:15
all the countries, they're the ones with the
1:22:17
most, it's live in 29 cities, you can
1:22:19
use it in the public transit systems in
1:22:21
Beijing. So China's trying to
1:22:23
really set the standard for CBDCs. And
1:22:25
what's really interesting with that is that
1:22:27
even ideological rivals like India, are looking
1:22:29
at this and they're like, well, as
1:22:31
a state, it's in my interest, monetary
1:22:33
supremacy, every central bank is aligned with
1:22:36
each other. I think there's
1:22:38
like 83 or 90% some high amount of
1:22:40
all the central banks in the Bank of
1:22:42
International Settlements, which basically has all the major
1:22:44
central banks as well. I think it has
1:22:46
like 90 central banks or something as
1:22:49
members. From
1:22:51
a central banker perspective, they love
1:22:53
CBDCs, of course. And they hate
1:22:56
Bitcoin, because this is exactly
1:22:58
oppositional to what they're trying to do.
1:23:02
And so China's trying to create
1:23:04
these standards, similar to
1:23:06
how it tried to create some internet
1:23:08
standards with Huawei for mobile. So it's
1:23:10
looking for like gaps. And,
1:23:13
you know, with CBDCs, the thing is the
1:23:15
states is explicitly
1:23:17
not going to do anything, right? Which
1:23:20
I think is a really good thing. But
1:23:22
at the same time, there's this idea of
1:23:24
like, well, China is trying to do a
1:23:26
lot of CBDC stuff with emerging
1:23:28
economies. And that, you know,
1:23:30
what is the response to that? I mean, I think from
1:23:33
a Bitcoin perspective, it's like, well, you'd love
1:23:35
to see those transactions in Bitcoin. But
1:23:38
obviously, the states we're talking about
1:23:40
are trying to transact otherwise. And
1:23:43
one of the more interesting things in this
1:23:45
is like, they want a fiat currency. Yeah.
1:23:47
Well, because they want to deal with
1:23:50
the government directly. Yeah. That the
1:23:52
Chinese government will never settle with you in Bitcoin, necessarily. I
1:23:54
think this is kind of part of the game
1:23:57
theory of Bitcoin becoming a global
1:23:59
monetary. You do need many
1:24:02
countries that are like kind of essential in
1:24:04
the supply chain for it to really kind
1:24:06
of like work out
1:24:08
in that way. So right now the ECNY, one of
1:24:12
the things they're trying to do is they're trying
1:24:14
to create a SWIFT alternative. So SWIFT is kind
1:24:16
of like the global system, AMITs, that's US European
1:24:18
allies. So they're suddenly, they
1:24:20
created this thing called M-bridge and
1:24:23
it's basically a bridge between different CBDCs.
1:24:27
So one thing about the digital yen is
1:24:29
it's not distributed ledger technology
1:24:31
or anything like that. It's just
1:24:33
a direct ledger from the government. And
1:24:35
so China has started buying oil from
1:24:37
the United Arab Emirates in
1:24:40
ECNY. Oh, I
1:24:43
didn't realize that. This
1:24:45
is explicitly an attack on the
1:24:47
petrodollar. Yeah. Right?
1:24:49
And this is kind of the
1:24:51
space where Bitcoin
1:24:54
still can't really play, unfortunately.
1:24:57
Because you would need multiple
1:24:59
nation states that are
1:25:01
importing and exporting critical goods to
1:25:04
each other for this to really matter.
1:25:06
To have an interplay. Yeah,
1:25:09
exactly. And you still have to
1:25:11
kind of beat the hump of
1:25:14
China Central Bank is still buying a lot of gold
1:25:16
in order to replace US debt. Because China
1:25:18
is trying to defer away from
1:25:20
US debt, but it's buying gold. It's
1:25:24
obviously not going to buy Bitcoin right now. They do
1:25:26
still hold some Bitcoin. I think
1:25:28
there is still a world where there
1:25:30
can be convinced that not holding Bitcoin is
1:25:32
a mistake. But
1:25:34
that's kind of like what's happening with the
1:25:36
ECNY internationally. I do think that the play
1:25:39
is to make it more of like the
1:25:41
standard since the US dollar is not
1:25:44
going to be programmable. And then nation
1:25:46
states are not going to pick and
1:25:48
choose. Most of them are not
1:25:50
going to currently pick and choose between Bitcoin and a
1:25:54
digital central bank digital
1:25:56
currency. They still want to settle in amounts
1:25:58
that are like large enough. They
1:26:00
want to know that it's backed like one to one by
1:26:03
the central bank in like another country. So the way I
1:26:05
compared it and actually the way I know if the book
1:26:07
is like China's kind of like trying
1:26:09
to API its way into other countries
1:26:12
and that works better because it is
1:26:14
another country. Yeah. Like the route
1:26:16
makes more sense. So like it's
1:26:19
not a bad it's not a bad strategy.
1:26:21
If you see kind of the CBD like
1:26:24
all of the powers that be basically
1:26:26
are aligned to try to build their
1:26:28
own CBDC and if you can have
1:26:30
the infrastructure in place to integrate their
1:26:32
CBDC with your economy and especially when
1:26:34
you're the largest exporter in the world,
1:26:36
you know, like it becomes a very
1:26:38
interesting dynamic of how much power you can
1:26:41
now have over the quote unquote new the
1:26:43
new internet
1:26:46
based system, the
1:26:48
new currency structure than
1:26:50
the old. And
1:26:52
it also puts a very interesting
1:26:55
light on the
1:26:58
potential embracing of stable coins
1:27:01
with Trump and the US is
1:27:04
that this could be
1:27:06
a, it would actually
1:27:08
be a move to say, oh,
1:27:10
well, the CBDC infrastructure is not going to be
1:27:12
the one that runs everything. It's going to be
1:27:15
the tethers and the stable coins of
1:27:17
the world. And we're going to put our plate, we're
1:27:19
going to put all our cards into that basket. You
1:27:21
know, like this is, this is where we're going
1:27:23
to move. And now the push is who's, who's
1:27:25
going to be faster and who's got the better
1:27:27
infrastructure for adoption versus
1:27:31
does it help the people? Does it help the central
1:27:33
banks? Does it help the governments? And you've
1:27:35
got this new power play of how the
1:27:37
hell is everything going to unfold? And all
1:27:39
the while, here's this Bitcoin wildcard sitting on
1:27:42
the side, trying to figure out how trying
1:27:44
to see how all that shit's going to fit in. And every time
1:27:46
there's a hype cycle, everything's going to change. You
1:27:48
know, everything's going to be up in the air again as to
1:27:51
which way the balance is shifting. I
1:27:55
think the stable coins and CBDC standards
1:27:57
is like fascinating because that is a
1:28:00
fight too. And then it's like
1:28:02
stablecoins versus Bitcoin, right? So, but
1:28:04
the stablecoins versus CBDCs things, stablecoins
1:28:06
are acting in a way where
1:28:08
they're like bottoms up, becoming
1:28:10
a country, if that makes
1:28:13
sense. Like countries are trying to reason with
1:28:15
it. And the one thing the US start
1:28:18
like, they're starting to understand
1:28:20
is that whatever this thing is, it buys a
1:28:22
ton of treasuries. Yeah. Yeah.
1:28:25
Like it buys a ton of treasuries.
1:28:27
Yeah. And so actually, I
1:28:29
was reading that Tether
1:28:31
wants to be the largest net buyer
1:28:33
of treasuries, like above
1:28:35
all other nation states. And this is at a
1:28:38
time when surprise me, it would be good for
1:28:41
them for what they're doing. And it would be it would be
1:28:43
crazy because what you would have is you'd have a banking, essentially
1:28:46
a pseudo banknote
1:28:48
system that was actually fully backed for the
1:28:50
first time. Yeah. Which
1:28:53
is crazy to think about, you
1:28:55
know, like, yeah. And
1:28:58
in the short term, I think countries will understand
1:29:00
that a little bit more than they will understand,
1:29:02
like how to interact with Bitcoin. You know what I'm
1:29:04
saying? Like from a bottoms up perspective. Yeah. Yeah.
1:29:08
And so that kind of becomes a fight. It's
1:29:10
like, I think what's what is going to end
1:29:12
up happening is the Western block, for lack of
1:29:14
a better word, they're putting
1:29:16
their eggs in the stablecoin basket. There's gonna be
1:29:18
some complaints. I think it depends on like, you
1:29:20
know, obviously, if there's like a Harris administration or
1:29:22
something, I mean, I'm sure they'll be, you
1:29:25
know, but Gillibrand was one of the sponsors
1:29:27
for the stablecoin act with Lummis. So
1:29:30
I think there is still, you know, some democratic
1:29:33
kind of support, no matter what my whole
1:29:35
thesis is like, because this thing is buying
1:29:37
so much US debt, and US
1:29:39
foreign US share of foreign reserves is
1:29:41
at all time low, or one of
1:29:43
its lowest points, 58%. Like, because of
1:29:45
that, you're gonna have to be dependent
1:29:50
on this bottoms up demand. Like you
1:29:52
might not like it, the Wall Street Journal might write
1:29:54
things like the demand is coming from criminals or like
1:29:56
whatever. Yeah. Sure. But
1:29:59
they are buying the
1:30:02
debt and the debt will be issued more
1:30:04
and more. So I think
1:30:07
Tether has a role
1:30:09
to play in that dynamic in terms of
1:30:11
like, and when I talk to people who
1:30:14
are more involved with discussions on the Hill,
1:30:16
like in Congress and stuff like that, they're
1:30:19
always talking about like, no one cares about
1:30:21
like, all they care about is stablecoins.
1:30:24
They just cared about stablecoins. And
1:30:26
like the dynamic of it, like how
1:30:29
to regulate it, like what's the deal
1:30:31
with that? I think that the tricky
1:30:33
part, and I've been trying to hit
1:30:35
at this in my articles without seeing like a crazy
1:30:37
person, but I'm like, you know, if you actually think
1:30:40
Bitcoin, which I believe Bitcoin is going
1:30:42
to be the superior money and the reserve, you still
1:30:44
have to find a way to, you have
1:30:47
to orange pill several countries. And
1:30:51
preferably almost all
1:30:53
at once, if that makes sense. Like there is
1:30:55
a critical mass of like countries. And I know
1:30:57
that like in theory, there's a game theory like
1:30:59
approach where it's like, hey, like you have other,
1:31:01
but in practice, what's going to end up happening
1:31:03
is like, I think if
1:31:06
you have like the United States and Trump
1:31:08
says like, doesn't matter what he does
1:31:10
actually, but if he just says that
1:31:12
he has his policy, other countries are
1:31:14
going to start like looking at this,
1:31:16
right? Including China. And so I think
1:31:18
like the stablecoin
1:31:21
conversation is going
1:31:23
to be something in the like
1:31:25
short term, medium term, but
1:31:28
then the long term, you have to ask yourself like,
1:31:31
well, at the end of the day, the
1:31:33
US dollar is backed by like Fiat will
1:31:35
and like, you know, the government is
1:31:37
structurally going to print more debt. Just
1:31:40
there is no way around that almost
1:31:42
like I don't like I just, if
1:31:45
you look at like the deficit, the
1:31:47
mass is just the mass. There's no
1:31:49
exactly it's mandatory. It's mandatory spent triggers.
1:31:51
And the other thing is, okay, this
1:31:53
is like, where I'm a little bit
1:31:55
pessimistic, because I also watch the Chinese
1:31:57
internet and I watch the Western internet.
1:32:00
And like my conclusion to take away from that is
1:32:02
like there's probably gonna be a war. I don't know
1:32:04
why I just think Maybe I'm like
1:32:06
maybe I just haven't taken my my happy pills
1:32:09
maybe I should just you know, but I go on X
1:32:12
and then I'm looking at like what's going on and then I go
1:32:14
on like like
1:32:18
Like wishing like like like
1:32:20
we chat and I'm like this is what's
1:32:22
going on the conversations like there's some crazy
1:32:24
Conversations that people I mean, there's a Twitter
1:32:26
account that people can follow called great translation
1:32:28
movement But people say some wild things
1:32:30
like when Pelosi came by like a lot of people were
1:32:32
like let's shoot her playing down right now So
1:32:36
it's pretty wild pretty wild like
1:32:38
a lot of nationalistic I think
1:32:40
bullshit happening So obviously
1:32:42
it's like I'm you know Like social networks are
1:32:45
not like a great place Part of
1:32:47
the reason why I love nostrils so much is like it's more
1:32:49
sane compared to all the social networks I feel like social networks
1:32:52
making it crazy by default the way
1:32:54
they work. It's so does so bonkers
1:32:57
Yeah, yeah, will and I talked about that on
1:32:59
the TPB like a while ago like yeah He
1:33:02
had some really good thoughts on that. But anyways It's
1:33:06
it's like wild but
1:33:08
I I think that Whether
1:33:11
it's the social media toxicity or like underlying I
1:33:13
do think there is that underlying current of like
1:33:16
I don't know if they're there there might
1:33:18
there already are two proxy wars that yeah,
1:33:20
the US it has support and finance and
1:33:23
I think that You
1:33:26
know when you look at like the switch into
1:33:28
world reserve currency There's usually a war involved like
1:33:30
I mean the United States dollar became predominant because
1:33:33
it was like the surviving industrial power of like
1:33:35
After World War two. Yeah, and it was
1:33:37
it had all the gold reserves and because it
1:33:40
was like the manufacturing hub So
1:33:42
it was able to export everything. I think
1:33:45
this is kind of like my medium term View
1:33:48
on this is that like the stable
1:33:51
coin of Bitcoin distinction will matter when
1:33:53
people realize like Doesn't make
1:33:55
sense for all of our world monetary
1:33:57
system reliant on one nation state, especially
1:33:59
a nation state that
1:34:01
may be in a block with other nations.
1:34:03
You're already seeing that happen because all the
1:34:05
BRICS countries are getting away
1:34:08
from US reserves, they're getting away from
1:34:10
US pensions. Because you
1:34:13
need a neutral standard. Everybody
1:34:15
uses email because you can't like China
1:34:17
and the US, they can't censor that.
1:34:19
So you need something in between. So
1:34:21
I think that's where Bitcoin and stablecoins
1:34:23
will make the difference. Because then the
1:34:25
other thing that will happen is if
1:34:28
there is war, and
1:34:30
I hope there isn't, but if there is, I think
1:34:33
that's where people will start
1:34:35
to really realize the censorship
1:34:39
resistant properties of Bitcoin really come
1:34:42
into play. Because tether is so
1:34:44
centralized. The company could decide to
1:34:46
burn your tokens for whatever
1:34:48
reason. Yeah, they have
1:34:50
to freeze accounts. They've done it before with-
1:34:53
They've frozen accounts. Yeah, they've frozen. That's part
1:34:55
of the dynamic of them being still able
1:34:57
to function. Even though they're less regulated than
1:35:00
like a circle, like when the
1:35:02
FBI or the NSA or wherever the
1:35:05
men, the hoods or whatever come
1:35:08
in, they are ready to, they
1:35:11
still have to act.
1:35:14
I think that's going to be really
1:35:17
interesting dynamic. I think Bitcoin is going
1:35:19
to flip, but it's going to take
1:35:22
some events. So
1:35:24
yeah, if I want
1:35:26
to sum up one thing I want people to take
1:35:28
away from this, it's just like Bitcoin
1:35:32
and China still really matter, the global dialogue.
1:35:36
And I think for Bitcoin to become like a
1:35:38
world reserve currency,
1:35:40
actually, if we're really serious
1:35:42
about that, it does involve
1:35:45
understanding the underlying nation
1:35:47
state models, but also
1:35:49
the competitor. One of the competitors is
1:35:52
China and it's CBDC exports. And
1:35:54
another competitor to a certain degree is
1:35:56
stablecoins. And how- Bitcoin
1:36:00
or Skine interface and whether
1:36:02
that's providing superior alternatives. One
1:36:06
thing I also wanted to add is the Chinese
1:36:08
stuff. I do find
1:36:10
it interesting that you have to build a financial system from
1:36:12
scratch because a lot of finances
1:36:14
in China are restricted. Your options to
1:36:16
take P2P loans and things like that
1:36:19
are very, very restricted. This is where I
1:36:22
think, just going off the queue
1:36:24
of the usage of covenants and things like
1:36:26
that, this is where
1:36:28
you could start seeing that being appealing
1:36:30
to a category of the
1:36:32
next billion. The easiest next billion
1:36:34
is Chinese people who are deprived
1:36:37
of basic
1:36:39
financial services. Yeah, and
1:36:41
then also giving them services
1:36:43
that they can't really access
1:36:45
except through the tightly controlled Chinese
1:36:48
banking system. That's
1:36:51
an easy next
1:36:53
billion if done. To a
1:36:55
certain degree, that is already
1:36:57
happening, though it's
1:36:59
more like buying tokens and things like
1:37:01
that. But when you
1:37:04
have the whole shebang, I think
1:37:06
that's when it really matters. Yeah, I feel like this is
1:37:08
kind of the default. A lot of people used to put
1:37:10
their money on FDX. And
1:37:12
the thing is with that is like a game. Yeah,
1:37:15
that's not, it sucks for them. And some people
1:37:17
still in Asia, especially, they keep their money on
1:37:19
Binance. The thing, the reason why they do that
1:37:21
though is because you have access to so many
1:37:23
different financial options that you would not have access
1:37:25
to otherwise. You know what I'm saying? So if
1:37:27
you can build that without
1:37:30
the exchanges, I think that could actually
1:37:32
be a really powerful layer for that
1:37:34
next billion. And then the other
1:37:37
stuff is I think going to be nation
1:37:40
state game theory. But when we talk
1:37:42
about that, that's like, I don't know,
1:37:44
I don't think there are many reasons for China to
1:37:46
adopt it quite now, unfortunately. I don't
1:37:49
want to take up a ton of your time,
1:37:51
but I think this is probably a good place
1:37:53
to lead into the conclusion here, is
1:37:56
are you going to stay on
1:37:58
a five to 10 year timeline? Yeah.
1:38:01
How hopeful are you that
1:38:03
we lead toward a better,
1:38:06
not really
1:38:09
horrible future and
1:38:13
positive on the Bitcoin side? And
1:38:16
is that the same view
1:38:18
that you have or is it very different when
1:38:20
you look at like a 30-year timeline? You
1:38:24
know, I'm really bullish on a
1:38:26
30-year timeline. I'm like extremely bullish on
1:38:29
a 30-year timeline. It's
1:38:31
actually kind of counterintuitive for me because I actually
1:38:33
think, I almost think of it as like, it's
1:38:35
either going to, it's either
1:38:38
or. Like either Bitcoin is going
1:38:40
to be the world's, it might
1:38:42
be something in between, but it won't be
1:38:44
very interesting if that's the case in 30 years, I
1:38:46
guess is the way I would put it.
1:38:50
I'm just like extremely bullish that it will
1:38:52
all come to pass eventually just
1:38:55
because of the dynamics of how
1:38:58
state debt is structured, like
1:39:01
what the drivers are going to be, what
1:39:04
that will mean for many countries. I
1:39:07
just wrote about this. One third of all
1:39:09
countries now are in the process of being
1:39:13
close to sovereign default. They
1:39:15
may default on their obligations. This
1:39:17
is one third. And this is
1:39:19
after COVID because what happened is COVID
1:39:22
basically applied like a systematic like spend
1:39:24
up for everyone. So
1:39:27
30 years for
1:39:29
me, it just tells me like, I just
1:39:31
think about it from the perspective of like, compute
1:39:33
is the most valuable thing. You're
1:39:36
going to need money that transacts across space. That's also
1:39:38
a trippy thing to think about. Physical
1:39:43
money is just going to be like
1:39:45
gold right now. I think I'm very,
1:39:47
very bearish on for
1:39:49
like a number of different reasons. I think like gold is
1:39:51
like once you have energy
1:39:54
figured out, like gold's
1:39:57
industrial uses are very... like
1:40:01
low relative, but like compute, this
1:40:03
is like the where you
1:40:05
dedicate your compute is like the most
1:40:07
prescient. Like it's actually like where
1:40:09
the economy is gonna go for the next like 20, 30
1:40:12
years. So super bullish on that
1:40:14
and super bullish on like the network effects.
1:40:16
I'm super bullish on like how far we
1:40:18
are, but yet like how much progress there's
1:40:21
been. Like the fact that the
1:40:23
ecosystem has so many educators, the fact that
1:40:25
the ecosystem has so many things being built,
1:40:27
the fact that so many people from different
1:40:29
countries are coming together. And this is Bitcoin
1:40:31
at like, it's like,
1:40:33
I don't even want to see it's a teenager right
1:40:35
now. You know, I want
1:40:37
to say like, we're still like, kind
1:40:39
of at the infancy a little
1:40:42
bit. It's like seventh grade. Seventh,
1:40:45
maybe seventh grade. Yeah, maybe like seventh
1:40:47
grade. Preteen, maybe preteen. It's like slightly
1:40:50
we're getting into the pre algebra classes
1:40:52
for like the AG
1:40:54
course. Yeah, exactly.
1:40:56
Exactly. Exactly. Like we're kind of kind of so that
1:40:58
gives me a lot of optimism, especially for the long
1:41:00
term. You know, all the China stuff, because I spent
1:41:02
a lot of time on that, like, what's kept me
1:41:05
really optimistic is people have come up to me and
1:41:07
been like, hey, not only have I
1:41:09
been orange build and purple build, but
1:41:12
I actually like that's led me to
1:41:14
like totally question all my like
1:41:16
previous beliefs and stuff like that. So like, you
1:41:18
know, people get into Bitcoin for any number of
1:41:20
different reasons. And some of them seem to be
1:41:22
leaving it with like new cypherpunk
1:41:25
convictions. They're like reading the cypherpunks or
1:41:27
reading how things like that. Yeah, so
1:41:29
that gives me a lot of optimism.
1:41:31
So the thing I always say is
1:41:33
like, it's kind of hard for
1:41:35
me to judge like exactly when all this will come
1:41:37
to pass. Yeah, you know, I'm like
1:41:40
a pretty big in economics.
1:41:42
So I study economics. The thing about econ is
1:41:44
very easy is you
1:41:46
just have to like understand that it's all
1:41:48
binary relationships. Like
1:41:51
market supply goes that shifts up this way.
1:41:53
So therefore this happens like if the demand
1:41:55
for warm reserves goes up and the interest,
1:41:57
you know what I'm saying? Like, it's all
1:41:59
binary relationships. So if
1:42:01
you ask me the question of like, is Bitcoin going to succeed
1:42:03
or not? My answer is very
1:42:06
much yes. And I've acted in that
1:42:08
conviction. But if you were to ask
1:42:10
me like how it would succeed, I would be
1:42:12
like, I don't know. We've traced
1:42:14
some plausible sounding paths, right? But
1:42:18
like, maybe like, because the thing is, is
1:42:20
like Bitcoin is 24 seven, encompassing
1:42:23
all of the chaos of the world. So predicting
1:42:25
Bitcoin is almost like you say you could predict
1:42:27
the entire world. Yeah, right.
1:42:29
Like everything you can predict the
1:42:32
way that the wind might blow at this
1:42:34
one particular place, at this one particular time,
1:42:36
distant in the future. And it's like, you
1:42:38
don't know the degree
1:42:40
of calculation, like, like, it's not even
1:42:43
a, it's not even an issue of
1:42:45
intelligence. It's you don't even have the
1:42:47
compute on planet earth to even begin
1:42:49
to come up with anything slightly useful
1:42:51
in making that prediction, you know, it
1:42:53
just it's not there. Yeah. And
1:42:56
if it was there, it would it would actually
1:42:58
replicate itself to the point where we wouldn't be
1:43:00
there anymore, because people would the existence of it
1:43:03
would then affect the experiment and make it not
1:43:05
work anymore. Like, it's like a it's like a
1:43:07
pattern in the market. As soon as somebody sees
1:43:09
the pattern, the pattern is dead. You know, exactly,
1:43:11
exactly. So, you know, medium term, I'm always like,
1:43:13
I don't really know how to, you know, I'm
1:43:16
in so many technical analysis rooms, and they always
1:43:18
seem so confident, like, there's going to be like
1:43:20
Bitcoin Bowl and like stuff like that. It's never
1:43:22
in this cup and handle, man, cup and handle,
1:43:24
look at it. Yeah, yeah, yeah, like whatever it
1:43:26
is, or dying cross, I don't even know. But
1:43:29
like, you know, and they seem very certain about
1:43:31
like, where Bitcoin will be in like, a
1:43:33
year or like six months from now. And I'm
1:43:36
just like, I don't know, like, I, you know,
1:43:38
I think I don't
1:43:40
want to say like, slightly pessimistic. But
1:43:43
I do think that in
1:43:47
the medium term, and some of this, I don't
1:43:49
know, some of this also bakes into
1:43:51
my thesis into like, why Bitcoin is going to
1:43:54
stand out. Unfortunately, I do have a
1:43:56
medium term view that like, more and more people
1:43:58
will need Bitcoin. I think partially. informed by a
1:44:00
lot of my research on like, you
1:44:02
have just more and more censorship, you
1:44:04
had more and more state control, you
1:44:07
had more states going out there, expanding
1:44:09
their powers. We see this drive towards
1:44:11
crisis situations, and in crisis situations, when
1:44:13
FDR sees the gold and everything
1:44:15
like that, that wasn't a
1:44:17
crisis situation, quote unquote. We
1:44:21
haven't seen the full extent of what the state
1:44:23
can and will do with
1:44:25
new technologies. I think right now, it's
1:44:27
still fairly passive. Like for
1:44:29
example, when you look at like national security agencies, they
1:44:31
always go on the same thing, they always go for
1:44:34
the worst thing. They'll be like, people are consuming child
1:44:36
pornography, so worse. Therefore we must end end to end
1:44:38
encryption, right? Or we must have
1:44:40
plain text communications for everyone. We
1:44:42
must not have alternative money. I mean, for Bitcoin, it's like,
1:44:45
they're sending money to a moss. Like
1:44:48
you have to take it down, right? We
1:44:52
have seen nowhere near the level of attack, I
1:44:54
think, yet, because like in a war
1:44:56
or anything else, that just... It'll
1:44:59
all go out the window. Norms
1:45:03
will be changed. Norms will be
1:45:05
changed, yeah. You think about rationing and all this
1:45:07
other stuff because we haven't seen
1:45:09
a war where the United States and
1:45:11
the Western Bloc has had its back against the
1:45:13
wall, if that makes sense.
1:45:17
Like since 1945, since
1:45:19
the nuclear age and everything like that. Like, yeah,
1:45:21
you can argue the Korean War, like that was
1:45:23
pretty nasty. You can
1:45:25
argue Vietnam was nasty, but it was
1:45:28
never like a question of whether or not the United
1:45:30
States would
1:45:33
persist after, if that makes sense. Like
1:45:36
it never... The Soviet Union and the
1:45:38
US like kind of had a couple, but it
1:45:40
never burst into like open warfare.
1:45:43
I think that... I'm not sure.
1:45:46
I still think there's like a low chance it will happen,
1:45:48
but I do think that if there is a
1:45:51
war that will... That's
1:45:53
where you're going to see all the toolboxes.
1:45:56
You know what I'm saying? Like all
1:45:58
the censorship. I look a lot at... the
1:46:00
people who are posting stuff and you
1:46:03
know, there's this contingent of people I call them you
1:46:06
know, tankies, it's all good like much love
1:46:08
but they love China and they love like
1:46:10
Russia and they love like all these governments
1:46:12
and a little bit like it's
1:46:14
a little bit you know, whatever but the important thing is
1:46:16
they raise money through PayPal. And
1:46:19
I'm always like, I don't always try to tell
1:46:21
them not to raise money on PayPal because
1:46:23
I'm like, you know, it's gonna be really dumb.
1:46:25
It's like you guys are gonna be the first
1:46:27
and the easiest to ban when like shit hits
1:46:29
the fan, right? And then I'm gonna
1:46:31
have to be in this embarrassing position of like, I
1:46:34
told you so but also like, yeah, like let's
1:46:36
get you all on Bitcoin or something right like
1:46:38
you might just click get on now. But
1:46:42
yeah, I think that's when you're gonna see
1:46:45
like the the state being unfang and a
1:46:47
lot of like new capacities being deployed and
1:46:49
you know, you see hints of this like
1:46:51
during the pandemic. And
1:46:54
during like, you know, what's happening in the UK and
1:46:56
the riots and stuff like that with these like states
1:46:58
of exception. But I just don't think
1:47:00
we've seen like the whole the whole shebang yet. So
1:47:02
sorry, I didn't want to end this on like a
1:47:04
total, you know, I actually I actually
1:47:06
think that would be slightly bullish for Bitcoin. I
1:47:09
was about to say that's the thing. That's the thing
1:47:11
is that necessity is the mother of invention. And
1:47:15
it's it's usually when pressures
1:47:17
when buttons get pushed, that
1:47:20
reactions happen that adjustments
1:47:22
occur. And we rethink how our technology is
1:47:25
or how we interact with it. Like, for
1:47:27
instance, I bet there's going to be an
1:47:29
aggressive market
1:47:35
moving forward in literally in
1:47:37
weeks for personally
1:47:41
built and programmed
1:47:43
pagers and walkie talkies. Yeah,
1:47:46
thanks to what just happened with
1:47:48
Hamas. So there's going
1:47:50
to be a really interesting shift.
1:47:53
And it's also important that as
1:47:55
technology proliferates the speed
1:47:58
and variety, the
1:48:00
veracity by which adjustments
1:48:03
can occur in the market will
1:48:05
increase a lot. So
1:48:07
at the same time that the toolset gets
1:48:10
really awful in a lot of ways, so
1:48:14
to do the reactions
1:48:16
to those, really my big
1:48:18
concern is, is
1:48:21
there still anywhere in the world
1:48:23
that has the culture to resist?
1:48:26
And that's one thing
1:48:28
that I find interesting about China and not
1:48:30
to... We probably should get you back on,
1:48:33
because I know we didn't even get into the
1:48:35
ML stuff, the machine learning
1:48:37
stuff, which I really did want to talk about.
1:48:39
Maybe we'll just do a whole AI and Jane
1:48:41
episode too. I don't know. But usually countries that
1:48:43
have gone through really crazy
1:48:46
government totalitarianism
1:48:55
have this cultural sense of we're
1:48:58
not going to go down that
1:49:00
road again. America
1:49:03
being a prime example, but a lot of
1:49:05
it may also be as to whether or
1:49:07
not they won, is does
1:49:09
it instill just this fear and giving up
1:49:11
into the culture or does it instill this,
1:49:14
we're going to fight back and there's nothing
1:49:16
you can do about it kind of thing.
1:49:18
And I hope that
1:49:21
the US still has enough of that,
1:49:24
remember the Alamo shit in their
1:49:26
blood that there's
1:49:30
something to lean on. And that
1:49:33
one thing you said of the people
1:49:35
who have finally gone down the rabbit
1:49:37
hole and adopted Bitcoin and stuff, is
1:49:39
that they rethink how they
1:49:42
thought the world worked and they read about
1:49:44
the cypherpunks and stuff. Damn.
1:49:47
That is a, even if it's just
1:49:49
1% of the people, that's
1:49:53
a culture that I would
1:49:55
love to see burning in the
1:49:57
little pockets all around the world. And
1:50:00
it is burning and it's a global culture
1:50:02
and it's just I think we're just gonna
1:50:04
be confronted with this question of like You
1:50:06
know all of us are a global community
1:50:08
within different countries Mm-hmm, and then
1:50:11
what happens when the countries leverage the reaction
1:50:13
will also be equivalent. So that's that gives
1:50:15
me hope like the community That
1:50:17
we have around is strong Like
1:50:21
I at least I feel like I go to bet F's and
1:50:23
one of the things about having the book out which is kind
1:50:25
of cool is I've been doing kind of a book tour and
1:50:28
Going out to different places. I'll be in London. I'll be
1:50:30
in Calgary and normally what I do
1:50:32
is I go to like the Bitcoin meetup at the big
1:50:35
devs in each place and It gives
1:50:37
me like a lot of hope to see like a lot of different
1:50:39
people from around the world kind of be ready
1:50:41
And build in their own way There's
1:50:44
a lot of people who you know want
1:50:46
Mandarin resources on Bitcoin, right? There's people who
1:50:48
built like Mandarin resources on how to get
1:50:51
on noster And so
1:50:53
I feel like there's these pockets here that gives
1:50:55
me like a lot of hope but
1:50:59
But it is a challenge. We are like I
1:51:01
don't want to say like, you know, but Almost
1:51:04
like Bitcoin to me. It was like a
1:51:06
technology that it separates state for money. That's
1:51:08
one of the most fascinating things, right? and
1:51:12
For people who are appealed who that
1:51:15
appeals to It's
1:51:17
almost like the bottoms-up approach like we kind
1:51:19
of are our own entity. Well, not quite
1:51:21
a country but you know like kind
1:51:23
of a Community of sorts or
1:51:25
like you can say like kind of like a nation
1:51:30
I don't know if you ever read Carl
1:51:32
Schmitt, but he defines like nation and state
1:51:35
That's also another whole topic. Yeah Reminds
1:51:38
me of Balaji's The
1:51:40
network state the network state. Yeah, kind of
1:51:42
like that. Although Balaji's got
1:51:44
really Very interesting
1:51:47
kind of views and he's a little over there But
1:51:49
yeah, he also said like Bitcoin would be a million
1:51:52
dollars and like whatever time which I think was like
1:51:54
a really bad Yeah And
1:51:57
yeah, his whole thesis of like it's the
1:51:59
New York Times versus CCP versus Bitcoin is
1:52:01
a little bit, I think, weird.
1:52:03
But anyways, but kind of like that. Yeah,
1:52:05
like, there's like free cities, there's like Prospera
1:52:08
and things like that, you know, there's a
1:52:10
free city's foundation. I think there's like a
1:52:12
couple places. But the reality is like, then
1:52:15
we are a nation, we can almost
1:52:17
say, there's a nation of like Bitcoin,
1:52:20
NOS or cypherpunk people that are online.
1:52:22
And this nation actually uses its own
1:52:24
money to transact with one another. But
1:52:26
we're not a state, in the
1:52:28
sense of like, there isn't that
1:52:31
like enforcement or anything, or there isn't protection
1:52:33
against other states. And then the other states
1:52:35
are like very confused about how to deal
1:52:38
with the whole thing. And sometimes it's a
1:52:40
company, right? The reason why stablecoins, I think
1:52:42
work for countries, is they understand it to
1:52:44
be controlled by a company. Yeah,
1:52:47
that makes more sense to them. versus like Bitcoin is
1:52:49
like, who runs Bitcoin? Yeah, what
1:52:51
is that? What does that mean?
1:52:53
So I love that idea, though, we're a nation,
1:52:55
but not a state. We're a
1:52:57
nation, but not a state. But maybe if enough
1:53:00
nation states buy
1:53:03
into the standards, buy into the
1:53:05
platforms. And, and my hope
1:53:07
is that like, when you orange fill countries,
1:53:09
you don't you don't just orange fill them,
1:53:11
you like purple, too. Like the
1:53:13
idea like, oh, if we need
1:53:15
like a neutral platform for money,
1:53:17
we should also have a neutral platform communications and things
1:53:20
like that. Then I think you
1:53:22
start seeing it become more of a state.
1:53:25
Yeah, makes sense. Yeah. Yeah. More
1:53:27
structured and and long
1:53:31
standing, I guess you could say, or
1:53:34
you have like physical space that is like Bitcoin friendly.
1:53:36
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. That makes sense too. And it ultimately,
1:53:38
I think like, I don't know, I also have this
1:53:40
crazy other thesis, we can talk about it some other
1:53:43
time. But I'm like, I think like the first people
1:53:45
who go to Mars or like, it's gonna be like
1:53:47
the United States, like, you know, like, to
1:53:49
get like a whole new system of governance, you literally had to
1:53:52
take a boat across the whole ocean. Yeah. And
1:53:54
then it was just like this blue water. I think like,
1:53:57
the first people in space, I think it's gonna be
1:53:59
like, the wild wild west.
1:54:01
That's going to be absolutely going to
1:54:03
have to unpack that. Okay. So maybe
1:54:06
read re up this hit me up
1:54:08
on noster. We did this over noster
1:54:10
dm right? Yeah, we did this over noster. Yeah. Yeah.
1:54:12
Hit me up on noster in like a month. And
1:54:15
then we'll kind of like start moving
1:54:18
through ideas that we want to cover. I want
1:54:20
to get a little bit of details
1:54:23
on the machine learning thing that you're working
1:54:25
on. And I'll catch up and
1:54:27
read some more of your stuff. I'll read your
1:54:29
book. Finally, I'll get to it. And
1:54:32
then we'll do this again. We'll do this again, man. I
1:54:34
appreciate it, guy. Well, it's a really good time
1:54:36
talking with you. And yeah, like, yeah,
1:54:39
so hopefully, did you get everything you needed? Or? Oh,
1:54:42
yeah, yeah, for sure. No. Let everybody
1:54:44
know where they can find you and stuff. I'll have links
1:54:46
and all this stuff in the description. But just in
1:54:48
case. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah, sure. Noster
1:54:50
try to be most active on noster these
1:54:52
days. So that would be low
1:54:55
key at noster
1:54:57
dash verified.com. So
1:55:00
that's my Nippo five. And then I think they
1:55:02
still gotta work on the public key experience. I've
1:55:05
heard they got to write Yeah, some
1:55:07
clients can't find NIPO five, which I
1:55:09
find really interesting, because I'm not gonna
1:55:11
not rattle off my MPub. What
1:55:14
you don't have it memorized? You loser.
1:55:17
I try. You know, I have, you
1:55:19
know, it just a n
1:55:21
six, whatever it is. But
1:55:24
yeah, but yeah, feel free to post it
1:55:26
because some people were complaining to me about
1:55:28
how like they couldn't put their NIPO five
1:55:30
anyways. And then if you have
1:55:33
to find out X, I am on X
1:55:35
as well. That's Roger H 1991. But I've
1:55:38
been have had my reach reduced many times
1:55:40
on there. So I think I wrote a few articles
1:55:42
criticizing Elon. It's all good, though. That's
1:55:45
our guess. It's all good. I wrote I
1:55:47
wrote like I went on this binge of
1:55:49
like, how can I piss off the most
1:55:51
people? I wrote this article that basically said
1:55:53
roll coin is total bullshit. And
1:55:55
then how like, you lie. That's great. I
1:55:57
love I love world coin shitting. Yeah,
1:56:00
so I wrote it before garbage, but I also made
1:56:02
it like kind of like a character judgment, which they
1:56:04
usually tell you not to. But I was like, I
1:56:06
was like, man, if Sam is doing this kind of
1:56:09
weird shit, what else is he thinking about the world?
1:56:12
So, but anyways, I am on there
1:56:14
Roger age 1991, if I must be found.
1:56:17
People still do x spaces and stuff. So there's always that.
1:56:20
And yeah, I'm like kind of doing a physical
1:56:22
tour. So I'll send you some links. But like,
1:56:25
I'm going to be doing like, I'll
1:56:27
be around in Bitcoin, Amsterdam, and there's like
1:56:29
a couple meetups and stuff. Cool. Cool. Yeah.
1:56:32
Hell yeah. Send me those links. I'll put them
1:56:34
in the show notes. Everybody go check out Roger
1:56:37
and check out the book. I have the link to that one
1:56:39
too. I'll get like an affiliate link on Amazon. I'll get like
1:56:41
two pennies or something for it. Thank
1:56:44
you, man. Thank you so much, man. It's been a blast. All
1:56:48
right. Well, guy, great talking with you. Yeah,
1:56:50
man. You too. That
1:56:54
was a good one. That was a really good one.
1:56:56
I hope you enjoyed that as much as I did.
1:56:59
Like I said, we will definitely be refreshing that to
1:57:01
have him on at some point in the future. And
1:57:04
I'll stay in contact with him. I'd love to get his
1:57:06
perspective on a bunch of other things. And we may even
1:57:08
cover some of his writing, just because he does have a
1:57:10
lot of things that we haven't talked about on the show
1:57:12
that I think would be really relevant. Then I will have
1:57:14
links and details in the
1:57:16
show notes for you to check out his
1:57:18
past work, the book, everything like that. And
1:57:20
that's the one thing that I really hope
1:57:23
to get, get completely through
1:57:25
before we talk to him again, is
1:57:27
actually sit down and read his book.
1:57:29
So links to anybody who wants
1:57:31
to get started on that, or would like
1:57:33
to have a copy of themselves. Don't forget
1:57:35
to check that out. Also our sponsors and
1:57:38
to everybody who supports this show. Thank you.
1:57:40
We have discounts and affiliate
1:57:42
codes in the show notes, which are
1:57:44
a great way to support this show
1:57:46
and let them know that we sent
1:57:48
you. You can get a discount on
1:57:50
your cold card to protect your Bitcoin.
1:57:52
Thank you so much to everybody who
1:57:54
supports me on Fountain, who boost and
1:57:57
does value for value in StreamSats. and
1:57:59
who zaps on Noster, which is kind of
1:58:01
the same thing now since Noster is
1:58:03
integrated with Fountain. And I will
1:58:06
catch you guys on the next episode
1:58:08
of Bitcoin Audible, and until then
1:58:10
everybody, take it easy guys.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More